Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33726798›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2021

The safety and efficacy of Glubran 2 as biliostatic agent in liver resection.

Renato Patrone, Vincenza Granata, Andrea Belli, Raffaele Palaia, Vittorio Albino, Mauro Piccirillo, Roberta Fusco, Fabiana Tatangelo, Guglielmo Nasti, Antonio Avallone and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Radiomics in hepatic metastasis by colorectal cancer.Infectious agents and cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renato PatronePhD ICTH, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansinin 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataDepartment of Support to Cancer Pathways Diagnostics Area, Radiology Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy. v.granata@istitutotumori.na.it.
Andrea BelliDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Hepatobiliary Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Raffaele PalaiaDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Hepatobiliary Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Vittorio AlbinoDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Hepatobiliary Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Mauro PiccirilloDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Hepatobiliary Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoDepartment of Support to Cancer Pathways Diagnostics Area, Radiology Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Fabiana TatangeloDepartment of Support to Cancer Pathways Diagnostics Area, Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Guglielmo NastiDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Oncology Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Antonio AvalloneDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Oncology Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - IRCCS Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Francesco IzzoDepartment Corp-S Care and Research of Cancer of the Abdominal District, Hepatobiliary Unit, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale - Napoli", Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiloma, an encapsulated collection of bile outside the biliary tree, supported by a predominantly iatrogenic biliary fistula, and bile likeage are two of the most important surgical complications after liver resection. We, hypothesized to conduct a project aimed to prevent, or reduce, the formation of biloma or biliary fistula applying on the hepatic resection area the cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran2).

methodsWe searched in our surgical database all patients underwent liver resection for mCRC from January 2013 to December 2018 and we found a total of 510 patients. 205 patients for Group A (study population: included patients in which we have used Glubran2 during surgical procedure) and 113 patients for Group B (control group), were enrolled.

resultsIn both Groups no patients died during hospitalization and the 30-day mortality was 0 %. During follow-up in Group A, a biliary fistula was found in 2 patients (1 %) versus 3 patients in the Group B (2,6 %). In patients enrolled in Group A no adverse event were reported relate to the use of Glubran2.

conclusionsIt is possible to affirm that the use of Glubran2 as biliostatic agent after liver resection is useful to prevent bile leakage complication and biloma formation and its use demonstrated to be safe and feasible during liver surgery.

Indexed as

Bile duct injuryChemotherapyEfficacyHepatic resectionLiver metastases

Identifiers

PMID33726798
PMCPMC7968309
OpenAlexW3137988686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.