Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33726695›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

RubiN - continuous care in regional networks: a study protocol for a prospective controlled trial.

Simone Gloystein, Friederike Thomé, Katja Goetz, Nicole Warkentin, Karola Mergenthal, Fabian Engler, Volker Amelung, Matthias Arnold, Felix Freigang, Ann-Kathrin Klähn and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [What is health services research?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simone GloysteinInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. simone.gloystein@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5578-264X
Friederike ThoméInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Katja GoetzInstitute of Family Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Nicole WarkentinInstitute of Family Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fabian EnglerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Volker AmelungPrivate Institute for Applied Care Research, inav Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias ArnoldPrivate Institute for Applied Care Research, inav Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix FreigangPrivate Institute for Applied Care Research, inav Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin KlähnPrivate Institute for Applied Care Research, inav Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sonja LaagDepartment for Product Strategy/ Development, BARMER Health Insurance, Wuppertal, Germany.
Neeltje van den BergInstitute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DEBARMER GEK · DE

Funding

Innovation Fund of the G-BA in Germany (joint federal committee) 01NVF17029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe health care situation of geriatric patients is often multifaceted, complex and often overlaps with social living conditions. Due to the lack of cross-sectoral and interprofessional health care geriatric patients often, receive insufficient care. Only a holistic view enables a comprehensive evaluation of the complex health risks, but also the potential to preserve the health of geriatric patients. The implementation of cross-sectoral, multi-professional case management could reduce the gaps in care, improve the autonomy of the geriatric patients in their own homes, and allow them to retain it as long as possible. The "RubiN" project examines the effects of multi-professional, cross-sectoral and assessment-based case management on the quality of the care of geriatric patients. The results of the study aim to show whether geriatric patients receive better care using case management than patients who receive standard health care. In addition, data on the effects of case management on practices of general practitioners (GP), the satisfaction with the care concept amongst the case managers, patients and relatives will be collected. Furthermore, a health economic analysis will be carried out.

methodsThe project is designed as a prospective controlled study and compares geriatric patients from practice networks in different regions in Germany. Inclusion criteria are: Age ≥ 70 years and care requirements from two different care complexes (identified with the screening instrument 'Angelina'-questionnaire). The intervention is the use of a geriatric case management, where health care is organised based on patient-specific care requirements. Five practice networks of physicians will implement the intervention (n = 3200 patients) and three practice networks will serve as the control group (n = 1200 patients). The primary endpoint is the ability to manage activities of daily living, measured using the Barthel Index. The patients in the intervention group receive geriatric case management and the patients in the control networks receive standard care ("care as usual"). The analysis of the primary data, which is pseudonymised, occurs according to the intention-to-treat principle. For this purpose, the endpoints will be analysed using a group comparison after 12 months. For the health economic analysis, secondary data from the statutory health insurance providers will be included in the analysis, in addition to the primary data. Data for the analysis of the effects the concept has on the GP practices as well as on the satisfaction of the project participants will be collected with questionnaires and interviews with experts. DISCUSSION: The implementation of cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary geriatric case management has been a topic of discussion for years, whereby positive effects have already been-shown. This planned study will be the first evaluation of the effect of case management for geriatric patients with a very large sample. In addition, the effects of case management on the GP practices and also on the relatives of the geriatric patients will be shown. It is intended that the study results pave the way for a widespread implementation of this concept.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00016642 . Registered on 29 October 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDelivery of Health CareAgedGermanyHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesAgeCase managementGeriatric assessmentGeriatric careHealth services researchInterdisciplinaryInterprofessional cooperationRegional health careRegional networking

Identifiers

PMID33726695
PMCPMC7962254
OpenAlexW3136739041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.