Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33726677›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Chromosome-length genome assembly and structural variations of the primal Basenji dog (Canis lupus familiaris) genome.

Richard J Edwards, Matt A Field, James M Ferguson, Olga Dudchenko, Jens Keilwagen, Benjamin D Rosen, Gary S Johnson, Edward S Rice, La Deanna Hillier, Jillian M Hammond and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fine-scale recombination rates inferred using the canFam4 assembly are strongly correlated with previous maps of dog recombination.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic testing predicts appearance but not behavior in dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Richard J Edwards *School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Matt A Field *Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4878, Australia.
James M Ferguson *Kinghorn Center for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Olga Dudchenko *The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jens KeilwagenJulius Kühn-Institut, Erwin-Baur-Str, 27 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Benjamin D RosenAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service USDA, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Gary S JohnsonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Edward S RiceDepartment of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
La Deanna HillierGenome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Jillian M HammondKinghorn Center for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Samuel G TowarnickiSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Arina OmerThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ruqayya KhanThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ksenia SkvortsovaGenomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Ozren BogdanovicSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Robert A ZammitVineyard Veterinary Hospital, 703 Windsor Rd, Vineyard, NSW, 2765, Australia.
Erez Lieberman AidenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. erez@erez.com.
Wesley C WarrenDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, Australia. warrenwc@missouri.edu.
J William O BallardDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia. jwoballard@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-6003

Funding

GENOME WIDE MAPPING OF LOOPS USING IN SITU HI-CUM1HG009375 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LIEBERMAN-AIDEN, EREZ · 2017 to 2021
$4.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG009375NIH HHS UM1HG009375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasenjis are considered an ancient dog breed of central African origins that still live and hunt with tribesmen in the African Congo. Nicknamed the barkless dog, Basenjis possess unique phylogeny, geographical origins and traits, making their genome structure of great interest. The increasing number of available canid reference genomes allows us to examine the impact the choice of reference genome makes with regard to reference genome quality and breed relatedness.

resultsHere, we report two high quality de novo Basenji genome assemblies: a female, China (CanFam_Bas), and a male, Wags. We conduct pairwise comparisons and report structural variations between assembled genomes of three dog breeds: Basenji (CanFam_Bas), Boxer (CanFam3.1) and German Shepherd Dog (GSD) (CanFam_GSD). CanFam_Bas is superior to CanFam3.1 in terms of genome contiguity and comparable overall to the high quality CanFam_GSD assembly. By aligning short read data from 58 representative dog breeds to three reference genomes, we demonstrate how the choice of reference genome significantly impacts both read mapping and variant detection.

conclusionsThe growing number of high-quality canid reference genomes means the choice of reference genome is an increasingly critical decision in subsequent canid variant analyses. The basal position of the Basenji makes it suitable for variant analysis for targeted applications of specific dog breeds. However, we believe more comprehensive analyses across the entire family of canids is more suited to a pangenome approach. Collectively this work highlights the importance the choice of reference genome makes in all variation studies.

Indexed as

WolvesAnimalsChinaChromosomesDogsFemaleGenomeGenomicsMaleArtificial selectionCanine genomeComparative genomicsDomestication

Identifiers

PMID33726677
PMCPMC7962210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.