ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
Juxtapose: a gene-embedding approach for comparing co-expression networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An artificial intelligence-based model for prediction of clonal hematopoiesis variants in cell-free DNA samples.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Biclustering data analysis: a comprehensive survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Accurately modeling biased random walks on weighted networks using node2vec.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Gene Co-Expression Network Tools and Databases for Crop Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Silver: Forging almost Gold Standard Datasets.Genes · 2021Article
- Comparative Analyses of Gene Co-expression Networks: Implementations and Applications in the Study of Evolution.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Translational Informatics for Natural Products as Antidepressant Agents.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene co-expression networks (GCNs) are not easily comparable due to their complex structure. In this paper, we propose a tool, Juxtapose, together with similarity measures that can be utilized for comparative transcriptomics between a set of organisms. While we focus on its application to comparing co-expression networks across species in evolutionary studies, Juxtapose is also generalizable to co-expression network comparisons across tissues or conditions within the same species.
methodsA word embedding strategy commonly used in natural language processing was utilized in order to generate gene embeddings based on walks made throughout the GCNs. Juxtapose was evaluated based on its ability to embed the nodes of synthetic structures in the networks consistently while also generating biologically informative results. Evaluation of the techniques proposed in this research utilized RNA-seq datasets from GTEx, a multi-species experiment of prefrontal cortex samples from the Gene Expression Omnibus, as well as synthesized datasets. Biological evaluation was performed using gene set enrichment analysis and known gene relationships in literature.
resultsWe show that Juxtapose is capable of globally aligning synthesized networks as well as identifying areas that are conserved in real gene co-expression networks without reliance on external biological information. Furthermore, output from a matching algorithm that uses cosine distance between GCN embeddings is shown to be an informative measure of similarity that reflects the amount of topological similarity between networks.
conclusionsJuxtapose can be used to align GCNs without relying on known biological similarities and enables post-hoc analyses using biological parameters, such as orthology of genes, or conserved or variable pathways. AVAILABILITY: A development version of the software used in this paper is available at https://github.com/klovens/juxtapose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.