Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33726663›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Exploring short k-mer profiles in cells and mobile elements from Archaea highlights the major influence of both the ecological niche and evolutionary history.

Ariane Bize, Cédric Midoux, Mahendra Mariadassou, Sophie Schbath, Patrick Forterre, Violette Da Cunha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ariane BizeUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, PROSE, F-92761, Antony, France. ariane.bize@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-8665
Cédric MidouxUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, PROSE, F-92761, Antony, France.
Mahendra MariadassouUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, F-78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Sophie SchbathUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, MaIAGE, F-78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Patrick ForterreInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Virologie des Archées, Département de Microbiologie, 25 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France. patrick.forterre@pasteur.fr.
Violette Da CunhaUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-CE05-0011-01European Research Council 340440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundK-mer-based methods have greatly advanced in recent years, largely driven by the realization of their biological significance and by the advent of next-generation sequencing. Their speed and their independence from the annotation process are major advantages. Their utility in the study of the mobilome has recently emerged and they seem a priori adapted to the patchy gene distribution and the lack of universal marker genes of viruses and plasmids. To provide a framework for the interpretation of results from k-mer based methods applied to archaea or their mobilome, we analyzed the 5-mer DNA profiles of close to 600 archaeal cells, viruses and plasmids. Archaea is one of the three domains of life. Archaea seem enriched in extremophiles and are associated with a high diversity of viral and plasmid families, many of which are specific to this domain. We explored the dataset structure by multivariate and statistical analyses, seeking to identify the underlying factors.

resultsFor cells, the 5-mer profiles were inconsistent with the phylogeny of archaea. At a finer taxonomic level, the influence of the taxonomy and the environmental constraints on 5-mer profiles was very strong. These two factors were interdependent to a significant extent, and the respective weights of their contributions varied according to the clade. A convergent adaptation was observed for the class Halobacteria, for which a strong 5-mer signature was identified. For mobile elements, coevolution with the host had a clear influence on their 5-mer profile. This enabled us to identify one previously known and one new case of recent host transfer based on the atypical composition of the mobile elements involved. Beyond the effect of coevolution, extrachromosomal elements strikingly retain the specific imprint of their own viral or plasmid taxonomic family in their 5-mer profile.

conclusionThis specific imprint confirms that the evolution of extrachromosomal elements is driven by multiple parameters and is not restricted to host adaptation. In addition, we detected only recent host transfer events, suggesting the fast evolution of short k-mer profiles. This calls for caution when using k-mers for host prediction, metagenomic binning or phylogenetic reconstruction.

Indexed as

ArchaeaVirusesEcosystemPhylogenyPlasmids5-merCodon compositionExtrachromosomal elementHalophilyHost transferHyperthermophilyMultivariate analysisPlasmidSignatureVirus

Identifiers

PMID33726663
PMCPMC7962313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.