ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2021
Harnessing the power of directed evolution to improve genome editing systems.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-CRISPR-mediated continuous directed evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 in human cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Anti-CRISPR-mediated continuous directed evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 in human cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A temperature-sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a system for sterile insect technique.Nature communications · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas12a-based technology: A powerful tool for biosensing in food safety.Trends in food science & technology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The recent development of genome editing systems, such as zinc-finger nucleases, transcription activator-like effectors, CRISPR-Cas nucleases, and base editors has enabled the unprecedented capability to engineer the genomes of living cells. The ever-increasing demand for genome editors with improved accuracy, activity, and functionality has stimulated significant efforts to further engineer the genome editing systems. Directed evolution represents a promising strategy to improve the existing genome editing systems and enable new editing functions. Here, we review recent representative strategies to harness the power of directed evolution to improve genome editing systems, which have led to state-of-the-art genome editors that have significant implications for diverse applications in both laboratories and clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.