ArticleObesity surgery2021
The Effect of Participation in Tier 3 Services on the Uptake of Bariatric Surgery.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions and attitudes towards obesity and metabolic and bariatric surgery for weight loss in children and adolescents: a survey among a subset of Chinese residents.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Personalizing a Weight Loss Program Using Cognitive-Behavioral Phenotypes to Improve Engagement and Weight Loss in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Changing Knowledge and Attitudes towards Bariatric Surgery in Primary Care: a 10-Year Cross-Sectional Survey.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Does preoperative weight loss in a specialist medical weight management centre influence postoperative weight loss after bariatric surgery?Clinical obesity · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the recognised advantages of bariatric and metabolic surgery, only a small proportion of patients receive this intervention. In the UK, weight management systems are divided into four tiers. Tier 3 is a clinician-lead weight loss service while tier 4 considers surgery. While there is little evidence that tier 3 has any long-term benefits for weight loss, this study aims to determine whether tier 3 improves the uptake of surgery.
methodA retrospective cohort study of all referrals to our unit between 2013 and 2016 was categorised according to source-tier 3, directly from the general practitioner (GP) or from another speciality. The likelihood of surgery was calculated using a regression model after considering patient demographics, comorbidities and distance from our hospital.
resultsOf the 399 patients, 69.2% were referred directly from the GP, 21.3% from tier 3, and 9.5% from another speciality of which 69.4%, 56.2%, and 36.8% progressed to surgery (p = 0.01). On regression analysis, patients from another speciality or GP were more likely to decide against surgery (OR 2.44 CI 1.13-6.80 p = 0.03 and OR 1.65 CI 1.10-3.12 p = 0.04 respectively) and more likely to be deemed not suitable for surgery by the MDT (OR 6.42 CI 1.25-33.1 p = 0.02 and OR 3.47 CI 1.11-12.9 p = 0.03) compared with tier 3 referrals.
conclusionAs patients from tier 3 were more likely to undergo bariatric and metabolic surgery, this intervention remains a relevant step in the pathway. Such patients are likely to be better informed about the benefits of surgery and risks of severe obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.