Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33725294›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer.

Francesco Bianco, Paola Incollingo, Armando Falato, Silvia De Franciscis, Andrea Belli, Fabio Carbone, Gaetano Gallo, Mario Fusco, Giovanni Maria Romano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review.Current oncology reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco BiancoGeneral Surgery Unit, San Leonardo Hospital, Castellammare di Stabia, ASL NA3 Sud, Viale Europa, 283, 80053, Naples, Italy. bianco.bar@tin.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4139-685X
Paola IncollingoGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, San Leonardo Hospital, Castellammare di Stabia, ASL NA3 Sud, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5116-1451
Armando FalatoGeneral and Laparoscopic Surgery Unit, San Giuliano Hospital, Giugliano in Campania, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-4560
Silvia De FranciscisIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Andrea BelliIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Fabio CarboneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gaetano GalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-4671
Mario FuscoCancer Registry Unit, ASL NA3 Sud, Torre del Greco, Italy.
Giovanni Maria RomanoSan Michele Hospital, Maddaloni, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITCasa di Cura San Michele · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITMagna Graecia University · ITOspedale degli Infermi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in coloanal anastomosis techniques, satisfactory procedures completed without complications remain lacking. We investigated the effectiveness of our recently developed 'Short stump and High anastomosis Pull-through' (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis without a stoma. In this retrospective study, we analysed functional outcomes, morbidity, and mortality rates and local recurrence of 37 patients treated using SHiP procedure, out of the 282 patients affected by rectal cancer treated in our institution between 2012 and 2020. The inclusion criterion was that the rectal cancer be located within 4 cm from the anal margin. One patient died of local and pulmonary recurrence after 6 years, one developed lung and liver metastases after 2 years, and one experienced local recurrence 2.5 years after surgery. No major leak, retraction, or ischaemia of the colonic stump occurred; the perioperative mortality rate was zero. Five patients (13.51%) had early complications. Stenosis of the anastomosis, which occurred in nine patients (24.3%), was the only long-term complication; only three (8.1%) were symptomatic and were treated with endoscopic dilation. The mean Wexner scores at 24 and 36 months were 8.3 and 8.1 points, respectively. At the 36-month check-up, six patients (24%) had major LARS, ten (40%) had minor LARS, and nine (36%) had no LARS. The functional results in terms of LARS were similar to those previously reported after immediate coloanal anastomosis with protective stoma. The SHiP procedure resulted in a drastic reduction in major complications, and none of the patients had a stoma.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsAnal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalColonHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesColoanal anastomosisPull- throughRectal cancerStomaTurnbull–Cutait

Identifiers

PMID33725294
PMCPMC8005393
OpenAlexW3138464608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.