Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33725200›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2021

Delivering Imagery Rescripting via Telehealth: Clinical Concerns, Benefits, and Recommendations.

Georgie Paulik, Gayle Maloney, Arnoud Arntz, Nathan Bachrach, Annemieke Koppeschaar, Peter McEvoy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgie PaulikPerth Voices Clinic, School of Psychology, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia. georgiepaulik@perthvoicesclinic.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-8922
Gayle MaloneyPerth OCD Clinic, West Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-2824
Arnoud ArntzDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7992-2272
Nathan BachrachGGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-2692
Annemieke KoppeschaarPsyQ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Peter McEvoySchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-6760
Curtin University · AUMurdoch University · AUPsyQ · NLTilburg University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewDelivery of psychological therapies via telehealth has increased with the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therapists may be hesitant in moving to telehealth when delivering therapies targeting memories of traumatic experiences. This paper collates the clinical experiences of clinicians and clients who have delivered or received imagery rescripting, respectively, via telehealth across a range of clinical presentations, and describes key clinical considerations and recommendations. RECENT

findingsIt is important to consider perceived and real safety; practical and technological issues; therapeutic alliance; depth of emotional processing; and dissociation. There was support for the delivery of imagery rescripting via telehealth being no less effective than face-to-face delivery; however, telehealth delivery was not a viable option for many clients during COVID-19 lockdowns who were living in high density housing, old houses with thin walls, or with some complex disorders.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Imagery rescriptingMental disordersRemote therapyTelehealthTelepsychology

Identifiers

PMID33725200
PMCPMC7962431
OpenAlexW3139122881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.