Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33725165›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2022

Online therapy: an added value for inpatient routine care? Perspectives from mental health care professionals.

Julia Sander, Felix Bolinski, Sandra Diekmann, Wolfgang Gaebel, Kristina Günther, Iris Hauth, Andreas Heinz, Annet Kleiboer, Heleen Riper, Nadine Trost and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia SanderGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics E.V. (DGPPN), Reinhardtstraße 27b, 10117, Berlin, Germany. j.sander@dgppn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-2351
Felix BolinskiVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra DiekmannLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang GaebelLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Kristina GüntherGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics E.V. (DGPPN), Reinhardtstraße 27b, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Iris HauthGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics E.V. (DGPPN), Reinhardtstraße 27b, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HeinzGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics E.V. (DGPPN), Reinhardtstraße 27b, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Annet KleiboerVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen RiperVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nadine TrostLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Oyono VlijterARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Jürgen ZielasekLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Gabriel GerlingerGerman Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics E.V. (DGPPN), Reinhardtstraße 27b, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychoanalyse, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Tiefenpsychologie · DELVR-Klinik Köln · DEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLArq Psychotrauma Expert Group · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet-delivered interventions can be effective in treating mental disorders. However, their rate of use in German psychiatric inpatient routine care is low. The current study aimed to investigate the attitude of mental health care professionals working in inpatient care regarding internet-delivered interventions, including presumed benefits, barriers and facilitators. In total, 176 health professionals from ten inpatient psychiatric hospitals throughout Germany were surveyed on site. The professionals' attitude towards internet-delivered interventions in inpatient care was assessed by an adapted version of the 'Attitude toward Telemedicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy' (ATTiP) questionnaire. To identify benefits, barriers and facilitators, we developed open-response questions that were based on the 'Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology' (UTAUT) and analyzed by a qualitative content analysis. Professionals reported little experience or knowledge about internet-delivered interventions. Their attitude towards internet-delivered interventions in psychiatric inpatient care was rather indifferent. The most frequently mentioned potential benefits were an optimised treatment structure and patient empowerment; the most frequently anticipated barriers were too severe symptoms of patients, the feared neglect of face-to-face contacts and insufficient technical equipment; and the most frequently mentioned facilitators were high usability of the internet-based intervention, a sufficient functional level of the patient and further education of staff. For successful implementation in the inpatient sector, internet-delivered interventions must be adapted to the special needs of severely mentally ill patients and to the hospital management systems and workflow. In addition, technical preconditions (internet access, devices) must be met. Last, further education of mental health care professionals is needed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInternet-Based InterventionMental DisordersGermanyHospitalizationHumansMental Health ServicesBarriersBenefitsE-mental healthFacilitators to implementationProfessionals’ attitudePsychiatric inpatient care

Identifiers

PMID33725165
PMCPMC7961170
OpenAlexW3138895166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.