Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33725011›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Improving the precision of modeling the incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in mainland China with an ensemble machine learning approach.

Guo-Hua Ye, Mirxat Alim, Peng Guan, De-Sheng Huang, Bao-Sen Zhou, Wei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guo-Hua YeDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Mirxat AlimDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Peng GuanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
De-Sheng HuangDepartment of Mathematics, School of Fundamental Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Bao-Sen ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Wei WuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-1682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), one of the main public health concerns in mainland China, is a group of clinically similar diseases caused by hantaviruses. Statistical approaches have always been leveraged to forecast the future incidence rates of certain infectious diseases to effectively control their prevalence and outbreak potential. Compared to the use of one base model, model stacking can often produce better forecasting results. In this study, we fitted the monthly reported cases of HFRS in mainland China with a model stacking approach and compared its forecasting performance with those of five base models.

methodWe fitted the monthly reported cases of HFRS ranging from January 2004 to June 2019 in mainland China with an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model; the Holt-Winter (HW) method, seasonal decomposition of the time series by LOESS (STL); a neural network autoregressive (NNAR) model; and an exponential smoothing state space model with a Box-Cox transformation; ARMA errors; and trend and seasonal components (TBATS), and we combined the forecasting results with the inverse rank approach. The forecasting performance was estimated based on several accuracy criteria for model prediction, including the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root-mean-squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE).

resultThere was a slight downward trend and obvious seasonal periodicity inherent in the time series data for HFRS in mainland China. The model stacking method was selected as the best approach with the best performance in terms of both fitting (RMSE 128.19, MAE 85.63, MAPE 8.18) and prediction (RMSE 151.86, MAE 118.28, MAPE 13.16).

conclusionThe results showed that model stacking by using the optimal mean forecasting weight of the five abovementioned models achieved the best performance in terms of predicting HFRS one year into the future. This study has corroborated the conclusion that model stacking is an easy way to enhance prediction accuracy when modeling HFRS.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerChinaDatasets as TopicDisease OutbreaksForecastingHemorrhagic Fever with Renal SyndromeHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalOrthohantavirusSeasons

Identifiers

PMID33725011
PMCPMC7963064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.