Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724921›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2021

Expanding Contraceptive Method Choice With a Hormonal Intrauterine System: Results From Mixed Methods Studies in Kenya and Zambia.

Deborah Sitrin, Anne Pfitzer, Gathari Ndirangu, Ameck Kamanga, Brenda Onguti, Susan Ontiri, Jully Chilambwe, Victor Kabwe, Lola Aladesanmi, Leah Elliott and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 'Global health action · 2026
    Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deborah SitrinMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Washington, DC, USA. deborah.sitrin@jhpiego.org.
Anne PfitzerMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Washington, DC, USA.
Gathari NdiranguMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ameck KamangaSafe Motherhood 360+, Jhpiego, Lusaka, Zambia.
Brenda OngutiMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Susan OntiriMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jully ChilambweSafe Motherhood 360+, Jhpiego, Lusaka, Zambia.
Victor KabweSafe Motherhood 360+, Jhpiego, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lola AladesanmiSafe Motherhood 360+, Jhpiego, Lusaka, Zambia.
Leah ElliottMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Washington, DC, USA.
Neeta BhatnagarMaternal and Child Survival Program, Jhpiego, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew women in low- and middle-income countries have access to the hormonal intrauterine system (IUS). Past research from a small number of facilities and the private sector suggest the IUS could be an important addition to the contraceptive method mix because it is the only long-acting method some women will adopt and users report high satisfaction and continuation. We aimed to determine whether these promising results were applicable in public facilities in Kenya and Zambia.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach with program monitoring data, interviews with women who received an IUS, and qualitative focus group discussions with providers. Data were collected in 2017-2019.

resultsFacilities in Kenya and Zambia reported 1,985 and 428 IUS insertions, respectively. If the IUS had not been available, 30% of adopters would have chosen a short-acting method. Women and providers gave diverse reasons for adopting the IUS, with the desire for fewer side effects being frequently mentioned in focus group discussions. Many IUS adopters first heard of the method on the day it was inserted (70% in Kenya, 47% in Zambia), yet providers reported that many women were unwilling to try a method they were just hearing about for the first time. Satisfaction and continuation were high: 86% of adopters in Kenya were still using the method 3-6 months after insertion and 78% were in Zambia (average 10 months post insertion). Providers also reported that most IUS adopters were satisfied; they rarely returned with complaints that could not be addressed with additional counseling.

conclusionExpanding IUS access through the public sector shows promise to increase contraception use and continuation in low- and middle-income countries. Efforts to strengthen availability should consider demand and engage directly with various communities, including youth, around availability of a new long-acting option.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Agents, FemaleIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedAdolescentContraceptionFemaleHumansKenyaLevonorgestrelZambiaContraceptive Agents, FemaleLevonorgestrel

Identifiers

PMID33724921
PMCPMC8087423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.