ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2021
Functional dystonia: A case-control study and risk prediction algorithm.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of movement disorders mislabeled as functional: when incongruence misleads.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Pain and functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- High Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Fibromyalgia in Functional Motor Disorder.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Functional cervical dystonia: diagnostic accuracy of distinct clinical features.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- The Complex Pathway of Conventional Investigations before the Diagnosis of Functional Motor Disorders.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Characteristics and Prognosis of Functional Movement Disorders in China: FMD-China Registry Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- Positive signs from the history as an aid for early diagnosis in functional movement disorders: The prospective TASMAN study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Biomarkers and Rehabilitation for Functional Neurological Disorder.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Rehabilitation for Functional Dystonia: Cases and Review of the Literature.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Review
- Neurosurgical and pharmacological management of dystonia.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Review
- 'Tricked' sensory trick: a geste antagoniste in functional dystonia.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Dystonia: Still a Mysterious Syndrome.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- Sudden Onset, Fixed Dystonia and Acute Peripheral Trauma as Diagnostic Clues for Functional Dystonia.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFunctional dystonia (FD) is a disabling and diagnostically challenging functional movement disorder (FMD). We sought to identify historical predictors of FD vs. other primary dystonias (ODs) and develop a practical prediction algorithm to guide neurologists.
methods1475 consecutive new patient medical records were reviewed at an adult/pediatric tertiary-referral dystonia clinic from 2005 to 2017. Ninety-nine met criteria for clinically established FD (85 adults and 14 pediatric), paired with 99 age/dystonia distribution-matched OD. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of FD and disability. We formed a prediction algorithm, assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).
resultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis investigating independent predictors of FD (P < 0.001) followed by development of a prediction algorithm showed that the most robust predictors included abrupt onset, spontaneous resolution/recurrence, pain, cognitive complaints, being on or pursuing disability, lifetime mood/anxiety disorder, comorbid functional somatic disorders, and having ≥3 medication allergies. The prediction algorithm had utility for both adult and pediatric FD, with excellent sensitivity/specificity (89%/92%) and an area under the curve (AUC) 0.95 (0.92-0.98). Greater disability (modified Rankin Scale) independently correlated with a number of functional examination features, unemployment/not attending school, number of medication allergies, and younger age of presentation. FD patients were high health-care utilizers and were more frequently prescribed opiates/opioids and benzodiazepines (P < 0.003).
interpretationThis case-control study provides an algorithm to guide clinicians in gauging their index of suspicion for a FD, with diagnostic confirmation subsequently informed by neurological examination. While this algorithm requires prospective validation, health-care utilization data underscore the importance and need for more research in FD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.