ArticleCancer medicine2021
Characterization of genetics in patients with mucosal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint blockade.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of SF3B1 Mutations on the Tumor Microenvironment and Response to Immunotherapy.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A Technique for the Generation of Mucosal and Acral Melanoma Cell Lines.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2026Article
- Mucosal Melanoma: An Overview of Recent Therapies.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- A novel germlinePathologica · 2025Article
- Specific oncogene activation of the cell of origin in mucosal melanoma.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Screening and novel diagnostic technologies for melanoma: an update.Melanoma management · 2025Review
- Individualized Neoantigen-Directed Melanoma Therapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Review
- The genetic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of the cervix using integrated bioinformatics analysis and whole-exome sequencing.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Primary Mucosal Melanoma: Clinical Experience from a Single Italian Center.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Advances in immunotherapy for mucosal melanoma: harnessing immune checkpoint inhibitors for improved treatment outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Current Status and Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Immunotherapy in Oral Malignant Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
- Comparison of Prognostic Factors for Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Mucosal Melanoma and Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: Insights into Their Etiologies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- RAS pathway regulation in melanoma.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mucosal melanoma is a rare form of melanoma which arises from melanocytes in the mucosal membranes and can be effectively treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, response rates in mucosal melanoma are lower than those observed for cutaneous melanomas. Targeted sequencing of up to 447 genes (OncoPanel) was performed on tumors from all mucosal melanoma patients seen at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2011 until March 2019. We identified a total of 46 patients who received ICB with both tumor-genotype and ICB response data available. Within this cohort of patients, 16 (35%) had durable clinical benefit (DCB) to their first line of ICB. The average mutational burden/megabase was 6.23 and did not correlate with tumor response to ICB. Patients with KIT aberrations had a higher DCB rate compared with patients with wildtype KIT (71 vs. 28%), but this was not found to be statistically significant. For comparison, we analyzed tumor genotypes from an additional 50 mucosal melanoma tumors and 189 cutaneous melanoma tumors. The most frequent mutations in mucosal melanoma were in SF3B1 (27%), KIT (18%), and NF1 (17%), a pattern that is distinct from cutaneous melanomas. In addition, there were genetic differences observed based upon the site of origin of the mucosal melanoma. Our findings explore clinical features of response in patients with mucosal melanoma treated with ICB and demonstrate a low mutational burden that does not correlate with response. In addition, the lack of significant association between the genetic aberrations tested and response to ICB indicates the need for further exploration in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.