Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724675›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2021

Beginning on an age-friendly journey: Barriers to implementing age-friendly initiatives.

Stephen Neville, Sara Napier, Kay Shannon, Jeffery Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen NevilleDepartment of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1699-6143
Sara NapierSchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kay ShannonDepartment of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jeffery AdamsShore and Whariki Research Centre, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-5249

Funding

Office for Seniors, New Zealand
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the barriers to communities in New Zealand developing age-friendly initiatives.

methodsA qualitative participatory approach underpinned this study. Semi-structured digitally recorded individual interviews were undertaken with 24 government officials, local government steering group members and community representatives from an urban city, provincial city and a rural district. A general inductive data analytic process was undertaken. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines were followed to ensure rigour in this study.

results(a) Being at the beginning, (b) Minimal diversity and (c) Problems getting started were three key issues identified.

conclusionsNew Zealand is in the early stages of becoming age-friendly. Findings from this study provide a place-based New Zealand perspective and have influenced central government social policy and practice development, culminating in resources supporting local government and communities to successfully implement age-friendly initiatives.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationHumansNew ZealandQualitative Researchcommunitygerontologyhealthy agingpolicysocial environment

Identifiers

PMID33724675
PMCPMC9292772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.