Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724654›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2021

The emergence of imaging mass spectrometry in drug discovery and development: Making a difference by driving decision making.

Stephen Castellino, Nichole M Lareau, Mark Reid Groseclose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial Distribution of Brain PET Tracers by MALDI Imaging.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Spatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Data parsing in mass spectrometry imaging using R Studio and Cardinal: A tutorial.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen CastellinoGlaxoSmithKline Bioimaging, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-7057
Nichole M LareauGlaxoSmithKline Bioimaging, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426, USA.
Mark Reid GrosecloseGlaxoSmithKline Bioimaging, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry is a dynamic, science-driven business constantly under pressure to innovate and morph into a higher performing organization. Innovations can include the implementation of new technologies, adopting new scientific methods, changing the decision-making process, compressing timelines, or making changes to the organizational structure. The drivers for the constant focus on performance improvement are the high cost of R&D as well as the lengthy timelines required to deliver new medicines for unmet needs. Successful innovations are measured against both the quality and quantity of potential new medicines in the pipeline and the delivery to patients. In this special feature article, we share our collective experience implementing matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI IMS) technology as an innovative approach to better understand the tissue biodistribution of drugs in the early phases of drug discovery to establish pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships, as well as in the development phase to understand pharmacology, toxicology, and disease pathogenesis. In our experience, successful implementation of MALDI IMS in support of therapeutic programs can be measured by the impact IMS studies have on driving decision making in pipeline progression. This provides a direct quantifiable measurement of the return to the organization for the investment in IMS. We have included discussion not only on the technical merits of IMS study conduct but also the key elements of setting study objectives, building collaborations, data integration into the medicine progression milestones, and potential pitfalls when trying to establish IMS in the pharmaceutical arena. We categorized IMS study types into five groups that parallel pipeline progression from the earliest phases of discovery to late stages of preclinical development. We conclude the article with some perspectives on how we see MALDI IMS maintaining relevance and becoming further embedded as an essential tool in the constantly changing environment of the pharmaceutical industry.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDrug DiscoveryMass SpectrometryHumansPharmacokineticsTissue Distributiondrug developmentdrug discoverydrug efficacydrug safetyMALDI imaging MSmedicine pipeline

Identifiers

PMID33724654
PMCPMC8365693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.