Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724637›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2022

Risk of requiring a walking aid after 6.5 years of ocrelizumab treatment in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: Data from the OPERA I and OPERA II trials.

Gavin Giovannoni, Ludwig Kappos, Jerome de Seze, Stephen L Hauser, James Overell, Harold Koendgen, Marianna Manfrini, Qing Wang, Jerry S Wolinsky

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01247324 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif®) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2022Enrolled821ConditionsRelapsing Multiple SclerosisArmsInterferon beta-1a, Ocrelizumab-matching placebo, Ocrelizumab, Interferon beta-1a-matching placebo
NCT01412333 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2022Enrolled835ConditionsRelapsing Multiple SclerosisArmsInterferon beta-1a, Ocrelizumab-matching placebo, Ocrelizumab, Interferon beta-1a-matching placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictors of Ocrelizumab Effectiveness in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Gavin GiovannoniQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ludwig KapposResearch Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience and MS Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jerome de SezeUniversity Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Stephen L HauserUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
James OverellF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Harold KoendgenF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Marianna ManfriniF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Qing WangF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Jerry S WolinskyMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHQueen Mary University of London · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRequiring a walking aid is a fundamental milestone in multiple sclerosis (MS), represented by an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥6.0. In the present study, we assess the effect of ocrelizumab (OCR) on time to EDSS score ≥6.0 in relapsing MS.

methodsTime to EDSS score ≥6.0 confirmed for ≥24 and ≥48 weeks was assessed over the course of 6.5 years (336 weeks) in the double-blind period (DBP) and open-label extension (OLE) period of the OPERA I (NCT01247324) and OPERA II (NCT01412333) studies.

resultsTime to reach EDSS score ≥6.0 was significantly delayed in those initially randomized to OCR versus interferon. Over 6.5 years, the risk of requiring a walking aid confirmed for ≥24 weeks was 34% lower among those who initiated OCR earlier versus delayed treatment (average hazard ratio [HR] DBP + OLE 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.95; p = 0.024); the risk of requiring a walking aid confirmed for ≥48 weeks was 46% lower (average HR DBP+OLE 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83; p = 0.004).

conclusionThe reduced risk of requiring a walking aid in earlier initiators of OCR demonstrates the long-term implications of earlier highly effective treatment.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansImmunologic FactorsWalkingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunologic Factorsocrelizumabdisease progressioninterferon beta 1amultiple sclerosisocrelizumabwalking stick

Identifiers

PMID33724637
PMCPMC9290576
OpenAlexW3136287523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.