Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724633›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society2021

Clinical prediction tool for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterales as the etiology of a bloodstream infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Rebecca Wang, Jennifer H Han, Ebbing Lautenbach, Pranita D Tamma, Kerri A Thom, Kevin Alby, Emily A Blumberg, Warren B Bilker, Alissa Werzen, Jacqueline Omorogbe and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The threat of multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative respiratory infections: another pandemic.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca WangDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-4743
Jennifer H HanGlaxoSmithKline, Rockville, MD, USA.
Ebbing LautenbachDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pranita D TammaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kerri A ThomDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kevin AlbyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Emily A BlumbergDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Warren B BilkerCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alissa WerzenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jacqueline OmorogbeCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pam TolomeoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Judith A AnesiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG)UM1AI104681 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vance G. Fowler, Henry F HENRY CHAMBERS · 2013 to 2026
$180.8M
Mentoring and patient-oriented research in antimicrobial resistanceK24AI080942 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2009 to 2013
$853k
Impact of donor bacterial infections on solid organ transplant recipient outcomesK01AI137317 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ANESI, JUDITH · 2019 to 2023
$722k
CDC HHS FOA#CK16-004National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5 UM 1AI104681-05NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000163NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000485NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI137317NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI080942NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI104681NIH HHS K01-AI137317NIH HHS K24-AI080942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are increasingly common among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, leading to challenges in the selection of empiric antimicrobial therapy. We sought to develop a clinical tool to predict which SOT recipients are at high risk for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (EB) bloodstream infection (BSI).

methodsA multicenter case-control study was performed. The source population included SOT recipients with an EB BSI between 2005 and 2018. Cases were those with ESBL-EB BSI; controls were those with non-ESBL EB BSI. The population was subdivided into derivation and validation cohorts based on study site. The predictive tool was developed in the derivation cohort through iterative multivariable logistic regression analyses that maximized the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC). External validity was assessed using the validation cohort.

resultsA total of 897 SOT recipients with an EB BSI were included, of which 539 were assigned to the derivation cohort (135, 25% ESBL-EB) and 358 to the validation cohort (221, 62% ESBL-EB). Using multivariable analyses, the most parsimonious model that was predictive of ESBL-EB BSI consisted of 10 variables, which fell into four clinical categories: prior colonization or infection with EB organisms, recent antimicrobial exposures, severity of preceding illness, and immunosuppressive regimen. This model achieved an AUC of 0.81 in the derivation cohort and 0.68 in the validation cohort.

conclusionsThough further refinements are needed in additional populations, this tool shows promise for guiding empiric therapy for SOT recipients with EB BSI.

Indexed as

BacteremiaOrgan TransplantationSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCase-Control StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamasesbloodstream infectionenterobacteralesextended-spectrum beta-lactamasepredictive tooltransplant

Identifiers

PMID33724633
PMCPMC8443704
OpenAlexW3138952493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.