ArticleDermatologic therapy2021
Dermatology outpatient clinic outcomes after COVID-19 outbreak: What is new normal?
Article in Dermatologic therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Comparison of Superficial-Cutaneous Fungal Infections Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Shiraz, Iran: A Retrospective Study (2018-2021).Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Dermatological Emergency Consultations in the Coronavirus Pandemic Era: Tertiary Clinic Experience.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on inpatient care related to skin conditions.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Dermatology outpatient clinic outcomes after COVID-19 outbreak: What is new normal?Dermatologic therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), which emerged in late 2019 and caused a pandemic, has significantly affected outpatient admissions to dermatology outpatient clinics. There have been changes in the number and composition of the patients who applied to the outpatient clinics. The dermatology outpatient clinic applications have dramatically decreased due to restrictions and prohibitions, and active participation of dermatologists in the field immediately after the pandemic. The composition of the diagnoses has also altered for reasons such as excessive use of hygiene products and types of protective equipment usage related to COVID-19. Intensive precautions have been taken in the first 3 months of the pandemic (March, April, and May). As of 12 May, controlled socialization started with new regulations. This period has been called "the normalization process." This study aims to evaluate the changes of the patients admitted to dermatology outpatient clinics within the normalization process. Despite the increasing number of COVID-19 patients and related deaths in the whole country with the new normal, the admissions to dermatology outpatient clinics have increased. During this period, acne and related diseases, pigmentation disorders, and viral skin infections had increased; dermatoses, xerosis cutis, and superficial fungal infections had reduced. It seems that nonurgent dermatological complaints affect the quality of life of patients and cause the need for an application. Although restrictions reduce these numbers, measures should be taken to protect patients and society during the ongoing pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.