Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724551›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Differences in inpatient and outpatient hepatitis C virus prevalence and linkage to care rates in a safety net hospital hepatitis C screening program.

Hima Veeramachaneni, Brandi Park, Danielle Blakely, Andres Palacio, Rapheisha Darby, Shelly-Ann Fluker, Robert H Lyles, Lesley S Miller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hima VeeramachaneniJ Willis Hurst Internal Medicine Residency Program, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-651X
Brandi ParkDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Danielle BlakelyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andres PalacioGrady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Rapheisha DarbyGrady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shelly-Ann FlukerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Robert H LylesDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lesley S MillerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-8732
Emory University · USGrady Health System · US

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Gilead SciencesNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimRoutine screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is crucial in identifying the 50% of infected persons unaware of their infection. We added an inpatient screening initiative to our successful outpatient HCV screening program in an urban, safety-net hospital.

methodsFrom March 2017 to December 2019, HCV screening was performed in inpatient and outpatient settings at Grady Health System. We compared care cascade outcomes, including anti-HCV testing, RNA testing, and linkage to care (LTC) between these settings.

resultsA total of 29 751 patients were tested for anti-HCV: 8883 inpatients and 20 868 outpatients. The anti-HCV population was predominantly Black (76.2%) and male (67.9%). The total anti-HCV prevalence was 8.9%, with 14% of inpatients and 6.7% of outpatients testing positive. RNA testing was performed on 86%. The prevalence of active HCV infection was 59.3% in those that were anti-HCV positive; inpatient prevalence was 66%, and outpatient was 53.8%. Of those with active infection, 67.5% were linked to care (57.3% of inpatients and 77.8% of outpatients).

conclusionWe found significant differences in prevalence of anti-HCV and LTC rates between inpatients and outpatients during an HCV screening program. Higher anti-HCV prevalence among inpatients may be due a higher prevalence of non-birth year HCV risk factors. LTC rates were lower in the inpatient setting despite a robust linkage strategy. The striking prevalence of HCV in both settings warrants continued screening, expansion to additional settings, and novel strategies to improve inpatient linkage rates, especially in the setting of new universal HCV screening guidelines.

Indexed as

HepacivirusHepatitis CFemaleHepatitis C AntibodiesHumansInpatientsMaleMass ScreeningOutpatientsPrevalenceRNASafety-net ProvidersHepatitis C AntibodiesRNABaby boomer screeningHepatitis CInpatient screeningLinkage to care

Identifiers

PMID33724551
PMCPMC8349761
OpenAlexW3139404668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.