Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724490›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical virology2021

What can cerebrospinal fluid testing and brain autopsies tell us about viral neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2.

Yan-Chao Li, Yan Zhang, Bai-Hong Tan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins trigger pain via TLR2/4-MyD88 pathway.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Post-Acute Sequelae and Mitochondrial Aberration in SARS-CoV-2 Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Extracellular Vesicles: The Invisible Heroes and Villains of COVID-19 Central Neuropathology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. [Subtle and subclinical neurological findings in patients with SARS-CoV-2].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. SARS-CoV-2 Morbidity in the CNS and the Aged Brain Specific Vulnerability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Infectious disease-associated encephalopathies.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan-Chao LiDepartment of Histology and Embryology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Norman Bethune College of Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-9829
Yan ZhangSchool of life Science, Jilin University, Jilin Province, China.
Bai-Hong TanLaboratory Teaching Center of Basic Medicine, Norman Bethune Health Science Center of Jilin University, Jilin Province, China.
First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide instructive clues for clinical practice and further research of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we analyzed the existing literature on viral neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. To date, SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain parenchyma in quite a few patients, which provide undeniable evidence for the neuroinvasive potential of this novel coronavirus. In contrast with the cerebrum and cerebellum, the detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 was higher in the olfactory system and the brainstem, both of which also showed severe microgliosis and lymphocytic infiltrations. As compared with the number of patients who underwent viral testing in the central nervous system (CNS), the number of patients showing positive results seems very small. However, it seems too early to conclude that the neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 is rare in COVID-19 patients because the detection methods or sampling procedures in some studies may not be suitable or sufficient to reveal the CNS infection induced by neurotropic viruses. Moreover, the primary symptoms and/or causes of death were distinctly different among examined patients, which probably caused more conspicuous pathological changes than those due to the direct infection that usually localized to specific brain areas. Unfortunately, most autopsy studies did not provide sufficient details about neurological symptoms or suspected diagnoses of the examined patients, and the documentation of neuropathological changes was often incomplete. Given the complex pathophysiology of COVID-19 and the characteristics of neurotropic viruses, it is understandable that any study of the CNS infection may inevitably have limitations.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralBrainCerebrospinal FluidCOVID-19HumansNervous System DiseasesOlfactory BulbOlfactory MucosaSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, Viralautopsybraincerebrospinal fluidneuroinvasionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33724490
PMCPMC8250680
OpenAlexW3136967900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.