Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724445›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2021

Multi-camera field monitoring reveals costs of learning for parasitoid foraging behaviour.

Jessica A C de Bruijn, Ilka Vosteen, Louise E M Vet, Hans M Smid, Jetske G de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Olfactory learning inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. TheEcology and evolution · 2023
    Review
  3. Perspectives for integrated insect pest protection in oilseed rape breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica A C de BruijnLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-3204
Ilka VosteenLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Louise E M VetLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hans M SmidLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jetske G de BoerDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3182-8543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic conditions in nature have led to the evolution of behavioural traits that allow animals to use information on local circumstances and adjust their behaviour accordingly, for example through learning. Although learning can improve foraging efficiency, the learned information can become unreliable as the environment continues to change. This could lead to potential fitness costs when memories holding such unreliable information persist. Indeed, persistent unreliable memory was found to reduce the foraging efficiency of the parasitoid Cotesia glomerata under laboratory conditions. Here, we evaluated the effect of such persistent unreliable memory on the foraging behaviour of C. glomerata in the field. This is a critical step in studies of foraging theory, since animal behaviour evolved under the complex conditions present in nature. Existing methods provide little detail on how parasitoids interact with their environment in the field, therefore we developed a novel multi-camera system that allowed us to trace parasitoid foraging behaviour in detail. With this multi-camera system, we studied how persistent unreliable memory affected the foraging behaviour of C. glomerata when these memories led parasitoids to plants infested with non-host caterpillars in a semi-field set-up. Our results demonstrate that persistent unreliable memory can lead to maladaptive foraging behaviour in C. glomerata under field conditions and increased the likelihood of oviposition in the non-host caterpillar Mamestra brassica. Furthermore, these time- and egg-related costs can be context dependent, since they rely on the plant species used. These results provide us with new insight on how animals use previously obtained information in naturally complex and dynamic foraging situations and confirm that costs and benefits of learning depend on the environment animals forage in. Although behavioural studies of small animals in natural habitats remain challenging, novel methods such as our multi-camera system contribute to understanding the nuances of animal foraging behaviour.

Indexed as

MothsWaspsAnimalsFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsLarvaOvipositionassociative learningbrassicaceous plant speciescabbage mothforaging efficiencylarge cabbage white butterflymemory reliabilitynon-hostparasitic wasp

Identifiers

PMID33724445
PMCPMC8361673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.