Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724410›Full record

ArticleGenetics2021

Rapid evolution at the Drosophila telomere: transposable element dynamics at an intrinsically unstable locus.

Michael P McGurk, Anne-Marie Dion-Côté, Daniel A Barbash

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cells · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael P McGurkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Anne-Marie Dion-CôtéDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Daniel A BarbashDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Drosophila Hybrid LethalityR01GM074737 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 2005 to 2022
$4.7M
Heterochromatin and satellite repeat sequence variation in natural populationsR01GM119125 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074737NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila telomeres have been maintained by three families of active transposable elements (TEs), HeT-A, TAHRE, and TART, collectively referred to as HTTs, for tens of millions of years, which contrasts with an unusually high degree of HTT interspecific variation. While the impacts of conflict and domestication are often invoked to explain HTT variation, the telomeres are unstable structures such that neutral mutational processes and evolutionary tradeoffs may also drive HTT evolution. We leveraged population genomic data to analyze nearly 10,000 HTT insertions in 85  Drosophila melanogaster genomes and compared their variation to other more typical TE families. We observe that occasional large-scale copy number expansions of both HTTs and other TE families occur, highlighting that the HTTs are, like their feral cousins, typically repressed but primed to take over given the opportunity. However, large expansions of HTTs are not caused by the runaway activity of any particular HTT subfamilies or even associated with telomere-specific TE activity, as might be expected if HTTs are in strong genetic conflict with their hosts. Rather than conflict, we instead suggest that distinctive aspects of HTT copy number variation and sequence diversity largely reflect telomere instability, with HTT insertions being lost at much higher rates than other TEs elsewhere in the genome. We extend previous observations that telomere deletions occur at a high rate, and surprisingly discover that more than one-third do not appear to have been healed with an HTT insertion. We also report that some HTT families may be preferentially activated by the erosion of whole telomeres, implying the existence of HTT-specific host control mechanisms. We further suggest that the persistent telomere localization of HTTs may reflect a highly successful evolutionary strategy that trades away a stable insertion site in order to have reduced impact on the host genome. We propose that HTT evolution is driven by multiple processes, with niche specialization and telomere instability being previously underappreciated and likely predominant.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenomic InstabilityPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticTelomereDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilagenomic conflicttelomereterminal deletionstransposable element

Identifiers

PMID33724410
PMCPMC8045721
OpenAlexW3132652937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.