Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724183›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Ancient DNA reveals the lost domestication history of South American camelids in Northern Chile and across the Andes.

Paloma Diaz-Maroto, Alba Rey-Iglesia, Isabel Cartajena, Lautaro Núñez, Michael V Westbury, Valeria Varas, Mauricio Moraga, Paula F Campos, Pablo Orozco-terWengel, Juan Carlos Marin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alpaca Keeping in Hungary: The First Nationwide Survey.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Paloma Diaz-MarotoThe Saxo Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-6609
Alba Rey-IglesiaSection for Evolutionary Genomics, the GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Isabel CartajenaFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Lautaro NúñezInstitute of Archaeological Research and Museum, Católica del Norte University, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile.
Michael V WestburySection for Evolutionary Genomics, the GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Valeria VarasSchool of Science Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Sciences, Austral of Chile University, Valdivia, Chile.
Mauricio MoragaHuman Genetics Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paula F CamposCIIMAR Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-4671
Pablo Orozco-terWengelSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7951-4148
Juan Carlos MarinICCMISAC - International Consortium for the Conservation Management and Improvement of South American Camelids, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-9422
Anders J HansenThe GLOBE Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Chile · CLAustral University of Chile · CLCardiff University · GBUniversidad Católica del Norte · CLUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Bío-Bío · CL

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica 1020316Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica 1070040Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1130917Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1140785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of South American camelids and their domestication is a highly debated topic in zooarchaeology. Identifying the domestic species (alpaca and llama) in archaeological sites based solely on morphological data is challenging due to their similarity with respect to their wild ancestors. Using genetic methods also presents challenges due to the hybridization history of the domestic species, which are thought to have extensively hybridized following the Spanish conquest of South America that resulted in camelids slaughtered en masse. In this study, we generated mitochondrial genomes for 61 ancient South American camelids dated between 3,500 and 2,400 years before the present (Early Formative period) from two archaeological sites in Northern Chile (Tulán-54 and Tulán-85), as well as 66 modern camelid mitogenomes and 815 modern mitochondrial control region sequences from across South America. In addition, we performed osteometric analyses to differentiate big and small body size camelids. A comparative analysis of these data suggests that a substantial proportion of the ancient vicuña genetic variation has been lost since the Early Formative period, as it is not present in modern specimens. Moreover, we propose a domestication hypothesis that includes an ancient guanaco population that no longer exists. Finally, we find evidence that interbreeding practices were widespread during the domestication process by the early camelid herders in the Atacama during the Early Formative period and predating the Spanish conquest.

Indexed as

DomesticationAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildArchaeologyCamelids, New WorldChileDNA, AncientDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationGenome, MitochondrialHybridization, GeneticDNA, AncientDNA, Mitochondrialancient DNAcamelidsdomesticationevolutionary biologygeneticsgenomicsmitochondrial genomeTulán

Identifiers

PMID33724183
PMCPMC8032396
OpenAlexW3138263446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.