Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724117›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2021

Clinical development of retroviral replicating vector Toca 511 for gene therapy of cancer.

Sara A Collins, Ashish H Shah, Derek Ostertag, Noriyuki Kasahara, Douglas J Jolly

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara A CollinsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Ashish H ShahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Derek OstertagTocagen, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Noriyuki KasaharaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-9082
Douglas J JollyTocagen, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Retriev Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Retroviral Replicating Vector-mediated Gene Therapy for Ovarian CancerR01CA213119 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KASAHARA, NORIYUKI · 2017 to 2022
$2.6M
GALV-Based Retroviral Replicating Vectors for Glioma Gene TherapyR21NS104454 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KASAHARA, NORIYUKI · 2019 to 2020
$798k
University of MIami Neurosurgery eDucation Strategy UMINDSR25NS108937 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DIETRICH, W DALTON, IAVARONE, ANTONIO · 2019 to 2024
$558k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213119NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS104454NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS108937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of tumor-selectively replicating viruses is a rapidly expanding field that is showing considerable promise for cancer treatment. Retroviral replicating vectors (RRV) are unique among the various replication-competent viruses currently being investigated for potential clinical utility, because they permanently integrate into the cancer cell genome and are capable of long-term persistence within tumors. RRV can mediate efficient tumor-specific delivery of prodrug activator genes, and subsequent prodrug treatment leads to synchronized cell killing of infected cancer cells, as well as activation of antitumor immune responses. AREAS COVERED: Here we review preclinical studies supporting bench-to-bedside translation of Toca 511, an optimized RRV for prodrug activator gene therapy, the results from Phase I through III clinical trials to date, and potential future directions for this therapy as well as other clinical candidate RRV. EXPERT OPINION: Toca 511 has shown highly promising results in early-stage clinical trials. This vector progressed to a registrational Phase III trial, but the results announced in late 2019 appeared negative overall. However, the median prodrug dosing schedule was not optimal, and promising possible efficacy was observed in some prespecified subgroups. Further clinical investigation, as well as development of RRV with other transgene payloads, is merited.

Indexed as

Cytosine DeaminaseNeoplasmsCell Line, TumorGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsRecombinant ProteinsCytosine DeaminaseRecombinant Proteinsvocimagene amiretrorepveccancergene therapyimmunotherapyRetroviral vector

Identifiers

PMID33724117
PMCPMC8429069
OpenAlexW3138418705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.