Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33724085›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2022

Physical Fitness Training in Patients with Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE): Safety analyses of a randomized clinical trial.

Torsten Rackoll, Alexander H Nave, Martin Ebinger, Matthias Endres, Ulrike Grittner, Agnes Flöel, ; for the PHYS-Stroke study group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Torsten RackollCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2170-5803
Alexander H NaveCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin EbingerCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias EndresCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike GrittnerBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Agnes FlöelCenter for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
; for the PHYS-Stroke study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimTo report the six-month safety analyses among patients enrolled in the "Physical Fitness Training in Subacute Stroke-PHYS-STROKE" trial and identify underlying risk factors associated with serious adverse events.

methodsWe performed a pre-specified safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled, endpoint-blinded trial comprising 200 patients with moderate to severe subacute stroke (days 5-45 after stroke) that were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either aerobic, bodyweight supported, treadmill-based training (n = 105), or relaxation sessions (n = 95, control group). Each intervention session lasted for 25 min, five times weekly for four weeks, in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. Serious adverse events defined as cerebro- and cardiovascular events, readmission to hospital, and death were assessed during six months of follow-up. Incident rate ratios (IRR) were calculated, and Poisson regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for serious adverse events and to test the association with aerobic training.

resultsSix months after stroke, 50 serious adverse events occurred in the trial with a higher incidence rate (per 100 patient-months) in the training group compared to the relaxation group (6.31 vs. 3.22; IRR 1.70, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.12). The association of aerobic training with serious adverse events incidence rates were modified by diabetes mellitus (IRR for interaction: 7.10, 95% CI 1.56 to 51.24) and by atrial fibrillation (IRR for interaction: 4.37, 95% CI 0.97 to 31.81).

conclusionsSafety analysis of the PHYS-STROKE trial found a higher rate of serious adverse events in patients randomized to aerobic training compared to control within six months after stroke. Exploratory analyses found an association between serious adverse events occurrence in the aerobic training group with pre-existing diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation which should be further investigated in future trials. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: The raw data and analyses scripts are provided by the authors on a secure online repository for reproduction of reported findings.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyHumansPhysical FitnessTreatment OutcomeAerobic treadmill trainingsafetyserious adverse eventsstroke rehabilitationsubacute stroke

Identifiers

PMID33724085
PMCPMC8739607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.