Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723922›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Living with Long term condition Scale: A pilot validation study of a new person centred tool in the UK.

Leire Ambrosio, Kelly Hislop-Lennie, Hannah Barker, David Culliford, Mari Carmen Portillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leire AmbrosioSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-7210
Kelly Hislop-LennieSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Hannah BarkerNIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Wessex University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
David CullifordSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Mari Carmen PortilloSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1583-6612

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo cross-culturally adapt and determine the preliminary psychometric properties of the English version of the LwLTC Scale in people living with long-term conditions in the UK.

designCross-cultural adaptation and cross-sectional study.

methodsForty-nine patients with five long-term conditions were included in the pilot study. Patients completed the English version of the LwLTC Scale and a bespoke questionnaire related to the scale. Feasibility/acceptability, internal consistency and construct validity were analysed.

results59.2% of participants were female, with an average age of 65.9 (SD = 12.30). Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged between 0.50 and 0.84. Content validity showed that the English version of the LwLTC Scale was useful even negative items were identified.

conclusionThese preliminary psychometric properties are satisfactory and promising. Further psychometric analyses are needed to verify them in a larger and more representative sample size during the main validation study, which is now in process.

Indexed as

Pilot ProjectsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsUnited Kingdomcross-cultural adaptationinstrumentsliving withlong term conditionpatientperson centredpilot study

Identifiers

PMID33723922
PMCPMC8186700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.