Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723854›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2021

Fitting marginalized two-part models to semicontinuous survey data arising from complex samples.

Valerie A Smith, Brady T West, Shiyu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valerie A SmithCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VAMC, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5170-9819
Brady T WestSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Shiyu ZhangSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 2017 to 2026
$6.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo accurately model semicontinuous data from complex surveys, we extend marginalized two-part models to a design-based inferential framework and provide guidance on incorporating complex sample designs. DATA SOURCES: 2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). STUDY

designWe describe the use of pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Jackknife Repeated Replication for estimating model parameters and sampling variance, respectively. We illustrate our approach using MEPS, modeling total healthcare expenditures in 2014 as a function of respondents' age and family income. We provide SAS and R code for implementing the extension, assessing model-fit indices, and evaluating the need to incorporate complex sampling features. DATA EXTRACTION

methodsData obtained from www.meps.ahrq.gov. PRINCIPLE

findingsA 100 percentage-point increase in family income as a percent of the federal poverty level was associated with a 5%-6% increase in healthcare spending. People over 65 had an increase of 4-5 times compared to those younger. Accounting for complex sampling in the models led to different parameter estimates and wider confidence intervals than the unweighted models. Ignoring complex sampling could lead to inaccurate finite population inference.

conclusionResearchers should account for complex sampling features when analyzing semicontinuous data from surveys.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAge FactorsHealth ExpendituresHumansIncomecomplex sample survey datahealthcare expendituresmarginalized two-part models

Identifiers

PMID33723854
PMCPMC8143695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.