Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723790›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2021

Non-Inferiority of a Single Injection of Sodium Hyaluronate Plus Sorbitol to Hylan G-F20: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bernard Cortet, Sandrine Lombion, Bernina Naissant, Eduard Vidovic, Olivier Bruyère

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernard CortetDepartment of Rheumatology and UR 4490, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France. Bernard.CORTET@CHRU-LILLE.FR.
Sandrine LombionSLC Biostatistics Consulting, Chamesey, France.
Bernina NaissantAptissen SA, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
Eduard VidovicAptissen SA Medical Department, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland.
Olivier BruyèreWHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing and Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Lille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral viscosupplement treatments are available for patients suffering from painful osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, but few comparative clinical trials have been conducted. The primary objective of the trial was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Synolis VA (80 mg hyaluronic acid and 160 mg sorbitol) (Group HA1) to Synvisc-One (48 mg hylan GF-20) (Group HA2) at Day 168 in terms of pain relief efficacy in patients with knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence radiological stage II or III) in whom oral treatment with analgesics, NSAIDs or weak opioids provided insufficient clinical responses or were poorly tolerated.

methodsThis was a prospective, multicentre, comparative, randomized, double-blinded trial comparing the two previously indicated viscosupplements, HA1 and HA2. The average VAS pain score (1-100) was 62.5 at baseline (Day 0). The patients were randomized into two parallel groups at Day 0 and followed until Day 168. They received one injection of either HA1 or HA2. The primary end point was the evolution of the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) pain index at D168 in the groups. One of the secondary end points was the daily assessment of this index by the patient for 7 days following the injection and thereafter at Day 14. The other secondary end points were the WOMAC pain, stiffness, function and total scores assessed at Day 28, Day 84 and Day 168. At Day 168, efficacy and satisfaction were assessed by the evaluator and by the patient using a Likert scale (7 points). Moreover, the number of strict responders in each group was evaluated according to the The Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) criteria (OMERACT-OARSI). The per protocol (PP) population was used for the primary analysis.

resultsA total of 202 patients were randomized. The patients were predominantly female (66%). The median age of the whole population was 65 years, and the median body mass index was 27.4 kg/m

conclusionIn this trial, we confirmed the non-inferiority of Synolis VA compared to Synvisc-One at Day 168 according to the WOMAC pain score. Safety was satisfying and comparable in the two groups.

trial registration2017-A00034-49.

Indexed as

Hyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularPain MeasurementProspective StudiesSorbitolTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic AcidhylanSorbitolEfficacyKnee osteoarthritisPainSingle injectionSynolis VASynvisc one

Identifiers

PMID33723790
PMCPMC8107072
OpenAlexW3137313628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.