ArticleHead and neck pathology2021
The Most Common Mistake in Laryngeal Pathology and How to Avoid it.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- An interpretable multi-instance learning method for accurate differentiation of malignant and benign laryngeal lesions in laryngoscopy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Laryngeal ectopic tonsillar tissue as a cause of dysphagia: a case report and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Confirmed laryngeal sarcomatoid carcinoma after three vocal cord surgeries in a short period of time: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Non-conventional laryngeal malignancies: a multicentre review of management and outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) spindle cell squamous carcinoma (SCSC), also known as sarcomatoid carcinoma, is a high-grade subtype of conventional squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that is histologically characterized by a combination of differentiated SCC in the form of intraepithelial dysplasia and/or invasive differentiated SCC, and the presence of an invasive (submucosal) undifferentiated malignant spindle-shaped and pleomorphic (epithelioid) cell component. Typically, SCSC presents as a superficial polypoid mass not infrequently with surface ulceration precluding identification of an intraepithelial dysplasia. Further, in many cases an invasive differentiated SCC is not identified. Adding to the complexity in such cases, is that immunohistochemical staining in a significant minority of cases is negative for epithelial-related markers but often the cells express mesenchymal-related markers. In such cases, differentiating SCSC from a reactive (benign) spindle cell proliferation or a mucosal-based sarcoma can be problematic, with treatment implications. Herein, we detail the clinical and pathologic features of laryngeal SCSC and discuss the rationale for diagnosing a carcinoma and avoiding a diagnosis of sarcoma. In our experience, such cases represent one of the more common mistakes made in laryngeal pathology. Yet, virtually all such lesions are SCSCs. The treatment and prognosis relies on the accuracy of this distinction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.