Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723717›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2021

Pain in Women: A Perspective Review on a Relevant Clinical Issue that Deserves Prioritization.

Roberto Casale, Fabiola Atzeni, Laura Bazzichi, Giovanna Beretta, Elisabetta Costantini, Paola Sacerdote, Cristina Tassorelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Climate Change and Air Pollution-Related Health Effects on Pain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto CasaleOPUSmedica, PC&R, Persons, Care & Research Network, Piacenza, Italy. robertocasale@opusmedica.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-6831
Fabiola AtzeniRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Laura BazzichiRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, A.O.U.P., Pisa, Italy.
Giovanna BerettaRehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta CostantiniAndrological and Urological Clinic, Terni Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Paola SacerdoteDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Cristina TassorelliHeadache, Science and Neurorehabilitation Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITQuantum Opus (United States) · USUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGender equity and gender medicine are opportunities not to be missed, and this Expert Group Opinion Paper on pain in women aims to review the treatment of pain conditions mainly affecting women, as well as the fundamental aspects of the different clinical response to drug treatment between the genders, and what can be done for gender-specific rehabilitation.

methodsPerspective review.

resultsGenotypic and phenotypic differences in pain between the sexes are conditioned by anatomical, physiological, neural, hormonal, psychological, social, and cultural factors, such as the response to pharmacological treatment to control pain. The examination of these factors shows that women are affected by pain diseases more frequently and severely than men and that they report pain more frequently and with a lower pain threshold than men. Some forms of pain are inherently related to gender differences, such as pain related to the genitourinary system. However, other forms of chronic pain are seen more frequently in women than men, such as migraine, rheumatological, and musculoskeletal pain, in particular fibromyalgia. DISCUSSION: Research is needed into the pathophysiological basis for gender differences in the generation of acute pain and maintenance of chronic pain, including the factors that put women at higher risk for developing chronic pain. In addition, different specialties need to collaborate to develop gender-related diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, and healthcare professionals need to upskill themselves in the appropriate management of pain using existing diagnostic tools and therapeutic options.

Indexed as

Dysfunctional syndromesGenderPainWomen

Identifiers

PMID33723717
PMCPMC8119594
OpenAlexW3139195549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.