Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723668›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021

Heating of an Aortic Stent for Coarctation Treatment During Magnetic Particle Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Ulrike Grzyska, Thomas Friedrich, Malte M Sieren, Erik Stahlberg, Thekla H Oechtering, Mandy Ahlborg, Thorsten M Buzug, Alex Frydrychowicz, Joerg Barkhausen, Julian Haegele and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bare-Metal Stent Tracking with Magnetic Particle Imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrike GrzyskaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. ulrike.grzyska@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0676-5624
Thomas FriedrichInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Malte M SierenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Erik StahlbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Thekla H OechteringDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Mandy AhlborgInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thorsten M BuzugInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Alex FrydrychowiczDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Joerg BarkhausenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Julian HaegeleDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Franz WegnerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEFraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering · DEDorma (Germany) · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01DL17010ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0069ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0071D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate heating of a redilatable stent for the treatment of aortic coarctation in neonates and small children in the new imaging modality magnetic particle imaging and established magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe cobalt-chromium stent (BabyStent, OSYPKA AG, Rheinfelden, Germany) has a stent design which allows for redilatation and adjustment of the diameter from 6 to 16 mm for a use in aortic coarctation. The stent loses its radial integrity while opening at predetermined breaking points at a diameter of 14 mm or 16 mm, respectively. We measured the temperature increase in the stent at different diameters during 7-min magnetic particle imaging and magnetic resonance imaging scans with fiber optic thermometers under static conditions surrounded by air. In magnetic particle imaging, stents with diameters from 6 to 16 mm were tested while in magnetic resonance imaging only stents with diameters of 6 mm and 14 mm were investigated exemplarily.

resultIn magnetic particle imaging, the measured temperature differences increased up to 4.7 K with growing diameters, whereas the opened stents with discontinuous struts at 14 and 16 mm showed only minimal heating of max. 0.5 K. In contrast to magnetic particle imaging, our measurements showed no heating of the stents during magnetic resonance imaging under identical conditions.

conclusionThe BabyStent did show only slight heating in magnetic particle imaging and no detectable temperature increase in magnetic resonance imaging.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingStentsAortic CoarctationBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationHeatingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTreatment OutcomeAortic coarctationEndovascular interventionsMagnetic particle imagingMagnetic resonance imagingSafetyStents

Identifiers

PMID33723668
PMCPMC8189960
OpenAlexW3137621574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.