Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723643›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

C Spiry, J Berhouet, C Agout, G Bacle, Luc Favard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retrospective analysis of the subscapularis-sparing approach for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C SpiryOrthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, Hôpital Trousseau, Avenue de la république, CHRU de Tours, 37170, Chambray-lès-Tours, France.
J BerhouetOrthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, Hôpital Trousseau, Avenue de la république, CHRU de Tours, 37170, Chambray-lès-Tours, France.
C AgoutPolyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France.
G BacleOrthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, Hôpital Trousseau, Avenue de la république, CHRU de Tours, 37170, Chambray-lès-Tours, France.
Luc FavardOrthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, Hôpital Trousseau, Avenue de la république, CHRU de Tours, 37170, Chambray-lès-Tours, France. luc.favard@univ-tours.fr.
Centre Val de Loire · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRPolyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause it medializes the centre of rotation, one of the drawbacks of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the risk of impingement between the humerus and lateral border of the scapula resulting in scapular notching. The long-term impact of this notching is not well known, either on function or the risk of glenoid loosening. The aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze the drawbacks of this notching.

methodsBetween 1993 and 2006, 81 patients (91 shoulders) underwent RSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis or massive cuff tear with or without osteoarthritis. This cohort was followed longitudinally with post-operative assessments done at one to two  years (T1), three to eight  years (T2), and nine+ years (T3). Before T3, 25 patients had died, nine were lost to follow-up, five  had the implants changed, and seven  had incomplete records. Thus, 45 shoulders were available for follow-up beyond nine years (mean follow-up of 12 years) and were used to determine the long-term impact of notching. Survival curves were generated using the occurrence of Sirveaux grade 3 or 4 notching and the presence of aseptic glenoid loosening as endpoints.

resultsThe survivorship before grade 3 or 4 notching developed was 83% at five years, 60% at 10 years, and 43% at 15 years. In the end, aseptic glenoid loosening occurred in four shoulders, all of which had developed grade 4 notching. No glenoid loosening occurred in the population with grade 0, 1, 2, or 3 notching (p = 0.02). The Constant score significantly decreased between T2 and T3, although it was not different between shoulders with and without advanced notching.

conclusionsBeyond the second year post-RSA, the number of shoulders with grade 3 or 4 notching increases steadily up to the longest follow-up. Grade 4 notching always preceded the occurrence of late glenoid loosening. The functional outcomes become significantly worse after the 9th year post-RSA, although they were not correlated to the presence of high-grade scapular notching.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder JointFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesScapulaTreatment OutcomeRadiological and clinical repercussionsReverse shoulder arthroplastyScapulaScapular pillar

Identifiers

PMID33723643
OpenAlexW3139060756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.