ArticleToxicology reports2021
Use of ivermectin in the treatment of Covid-19: A pilot trial.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. It is linked to trial NCT04431466 (Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Ivermectin in Patients Diagnosed With the New Coronavirus Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Ivermectin in Patients Diagnosed With the New Coronavirus Infection (SARS-CoV-2)
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug treatments for mild or moderate covid-19: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Ivermectin under scrutiny: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and possible sources of controversies in COVID-19 patients.Virology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2021Pooled it
- Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines.American journal of therapeutics · 2021Pooled it
- Ivermectin compared with placebo in the clinical course in Mexican patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Trial
- Clinical study evaluating the efficacy of ivermectin in COVID-19 treatment: A randomized controlled study.Journal of medical virology · 2021Trial
- Clinical Experience With Ivermectin and Nitazoxanide in the Management of COVID-19 Among Mexican Out- and Inpatients.Cureus · 2024Article
- Outcome of Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment: An Experience in Loja-Ecuador.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Antiparasitic Drugs against SARS-CoV-2: A Comprehensive Literature Survey.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Identification and Development of Therapeutics for COVID-19.mSystems · 2021Article
- Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Control between Drug Repurposing and Vaccination: A Comprehensive Overview.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Immune response (IgG) following full inoculation with BNT162b2 COVID‑19 mRNA among healthcare professionals.International journal of molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Structural deformability induced in proteins of potential interest associated with COVID-19 by binding of homologues present in ivermectin: Comparative study based in elastic networks models.Journal of molecular liquids · 2021Article
- Macrolides: From Toxins to Therapeutics.Toxins · 2021Review
- Article
- Multipurpose Drugs Active Against BothFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- Major Insights in Dynamics of Host Response to SARS-CoV-2: Impacts and Challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern · 2021-12-17Concerns/Issues about Data · Updated to Retraction · · the entire issue is subject to an expression of concern
- Retraction · 2022-05-02Bias Issues or Lack of Balance · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn this randomized open-label trial pilot study we assessed the antiviral effects and safety of various doses of ivermectin in patients with mild clinical symptoms of COVID-19.
methodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive standard of care (SOC) treatment at hospital admission; SOC plus ivermectin 100 mcg/kg; SOC plus ivermectin 200 mcg/kg; or SOC plus ivermectin 400 mcg/kg. The primary assessed endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR tests within 7 days of the start of the dosing period. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04431466).
resultsA total of 32 patients were enrolled and randomized to treatment. SOC treatment together with ivermectin did not result in any serious adverse events. All patients exhibited a reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load within 7 days; however, those who received ivermectin had a more consistent decrease as compared to the SOC alone group, characterized by a shorter time for obtaining two consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR tests.
conclusionsIvermectin is safe in patients with SARS-CoV-2, reducing symptomatology and the SARS-CoV-2 viral load. This antiviral effect appears to depend on the dose used, and if confirmed in future studies, it suggests that ivermectin may be a useful adjuvant to the SOC treatment in patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.