Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723458›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2021

Toward universal health coverage in the post-COVID-19 era.

Stéphane Verguet, Alemayehu Hailu, Getachew Teshome Eregata, Solomon Tessema Memirie, Kjell Arne Johansson, Ole Frithjof Norheim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stéphane VerguetDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Alemayehu HailuFederal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Getachew Teshome EregataFederal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Solomon Tessema MemirieDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-2453
Kjell Arne JohanssonDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ole Frithjof NorheimDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Ole.Norheim@uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-5956

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) INV-010174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All countries worldwide have signed up to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and have committed to the objective of achieving 'universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all'. During the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, advancement toward universal health coverage (UHC) will become more difficult for many countries, demonstrating that locally led priority setting is urgently needed to provide health services with appropriate financial protection to all. Because resources are limited and no national constituency can provide an unlimited number of services to their whole population in a sustainable manner, rationing and setting priorities for the selection of interventions to be included in a defined package of services is critical. In this Perspective, we discuss how packages of essential health services can be developed in resource-constrained settings, and detail how experts and the public can decide on principles and criteria, use a comprehensive array of analytical methods and choose which services to be provided free of charge. We illustrate these main steps while drawing on a recently conducted exercise of revising the national essential health services package in Ethiopia, which we compare with examples from other countries that have defined their essential benefits packages. This Perspective also provides recommendations for other low- and middle-income countries on their pathway to UHC.

Indexed as

Health Care RationingHealth PlanningHealth PrioritiesUniversal Health CareCOVID-19EthiopiaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansSARS-CoV-2Sustainable Development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.