Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33723454›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2021

Hindsight is 2020? Lessons in global health governance one year into the pandemic.

Ines Hassan, Mitsuru Mukaigawara, Lois King, Genevie Fernandes, Devi Sridhar

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 and the ecological crisis: What do they have in common?Scandinavian journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Advantages of the Zero-COVID-19 Strategy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Humanitarian inversions: COVID-19 as crisis.Transactions (Institute of British Geographers : 1965) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ines HassanGlobal Health Governance Programme, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mitsuru MukaigawaraHarvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lois KingGlobal Health Governance Programme, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Genevie FernandesGlobal Health Governance Programme, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Devi SridharGlobal Health Governance Programme, Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. devi.sridhar@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-9023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fourteen months into the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we identify key lessons in the global and national responses to the pandemic. The World Health Organization has played a pivotal technical, normative and coordinating role, but has been constrained by its lack of authority over sovereign member states. Many governments also mistakenly attempted to manage COVID-19 like influenza, resulting in repeated lockdowns, high excess morbidity and mortality, and poor economic recovery. Despite the incredible speed of the development and approval of effective and safe vaccines, the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants means that all countries will have to rely on a globally coordinated public health effort for several years to defeat this pandemic.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlGlobal HealthCOVID-19GovernmentHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPandemicsPublic HealthPublic Health AdministrationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.