Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33722865›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Predictive value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for the short-term prognosis of emergency trauma patients: a retrospective study.

Zhejun Yu, Feng Xu, Du Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mortality prediction in older adults with earthquake-related trauma: a model combining MEWS and laboratory biomarkers.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Early risk stratification in traumatic brain injury: An analysis of MEWS and rSIG scores in patients with isolated head trauma.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Systems for recognition and response to deteriorating emergency department patients: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhejun Yu *Division of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Feng Xu *Division of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Du ChenDivision of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China sdfyycd@suda.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-3310
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the predictive value of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for emergency trauma patients who died within 24 hours.

designA retrospective, single-centred study.

settingThis study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Southern China.

participantsA total of 1739 patients with acute trauma, aged 16 years or older who presented to the emergency department from 1 November 2016 to 30 November 2019, were included. INTERVENTIONS NONE: None. OUTCOME: 24-hour mortality was the primary outcome of trauma.

results1739 patients were divided into the survival group (1709 patients,98.27%), and the non-survival group (30 patients,1.73%). Crude OR and adjusted OR of MEWS were 1.99, 95% CI (1.73 to 2.29), and 2.00, 95% CI (1.74 to 2.31), p<0.001, respectively. Crude OR and adjusted OR of RTS were 0.62, 95% CI (0.55 to 0.69) and 0.61, 95% CI (0.55 to 0.68), p<0.001, respectively. The area under the curve of MEWS was significantly higher than that of RTS (p=0.005): 0.927, 95% CI (0.914 to 0.939) vs 0.799, 95% CI (0.779 to 0.817).

conclusionsBoth MEWS and RTS were independent predictors of the short-term prognosis in emergency trauma patients, MEWS had better predictive efficacy.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScoreAdolescentChinaEmergency Service, HospitalHospital MortalityHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studiesaccident & emergency medicineclinical physiologytrauma management

Identifiers

PMID33722865
PMCPMC7959230
OpenAlexW3138576482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.