Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33722791›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration.

Jérémie F Cohen, Jonathan J Deeks, Lotty Hooft, Jean-Paul Salameh, Daniël A Korevaar, Constantine Gatsonis, Sally Hopewell, Harriet A Hunt, Chris J Hyde, Mariska M Leeflang and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Prognostic factors and outcomes of surgical intervention for patients with spinal metastases secondary to lung cancer: an update systematic review and meta analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Digital Help for Substance Users (SU): A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  17. Virtual Reality (VR) Technology for Treatment of Mental Health Problems during COVID-19: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jérémie F CohenDepartment of Pediatrics and Inserm UMR 1153 (Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics), Necker - Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jonathan J DeeksInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lotty HooftCochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jean-Paul SalamehThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Daniël A KorevaarDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Constantine GatsonisBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Sally HopewellCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Harriet A HuntExeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Chris J HydeExeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Mariska M LeeflangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Public Health, Academic Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Petra MacaskillUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Trevor A McGrathDepartment of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
David MoherCentre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Johannes B ReitsmaCochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anne W S RutjesInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yemisi TakwoingiInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Penny WhitingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Brian H WillisInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Brett ThombsLady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Patrick M BossuytDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Public Health, Academic Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Matthew D F McInnesUniversity of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada mmcinnes@toh.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-4075

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701649Medical Research Council MR/N007999/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID33722791
PMCPMC7957862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.