Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33722618›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021

Hippocampal volume and navigational ability: The map(ping) is not to scale.

Steven M Weisberg, Arne D Ekstrom

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Navigating space and the developing mind.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Examining the association between posttraumatic stress disorder and disruptions in cortical networks identified using data-driven methods.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven M WeisbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, 945 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States. Electronic address: stevenweisberg@ufl.edu.
Arne D EkstromDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85719, United States; Evelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, 85719, United States. Electronic address: adekstrom@arizona.edu.

Funding

Representation of spatiotemporal information in human episodic memory and navigationR01NS076856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARNE D EKSTROM · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Critical Life Event Support for K01 NIA AwardeeK01AG070333 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WEISBERG, STEVEN M · 2021 to 2025
$694k
Volumetric and connectivity measures of navigation and memory skill acquisitionR21NS120237 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D, WEISBERG, STEVEN M · 2020 to 2020
$434k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG070333NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076856NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS120237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical question regards the neural basis of complex cognitive skill acquisition. One extensively studied skill is navigation, with evidence suggesting that humans vary widely in navigation abilities. Yet, data supporting the neural underpinning of these individual differences are mixed. Some evidence suggests robust structure-behavior relations between hippocampal volume and navigation ability, whereas other experiments show no such correlation. We focus on several possibilities for these discrepancies: 1) volumetric hippocampal changes are relevant only at the extreme ranges of navigational abilities; 2) hippocampal volume correlates across individuals but only for specific measures of navigation skill; 3) hippocampal volume itself does not correlate with navigation skill acquisition; connectivity patterns are more relevant. To explore this third possibility, we present a model emphasizing functional connectivity changes, particularly to extra-hippocampal structures. This class of models arises from the premise that navigation is dynamic and that good navigators flexibly solve spatial challenges. These models pave the way for research on other skills and provide more precise predictions for the neural basis of skill acquisition.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationHippocampusHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain volumeFunctional connectivityHippocampusMRISpatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID33722618
PMCPMC8402939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.