ArticleJournal of immunological methods2021
Development of a non-biased, high-throughput ELISA for the rapid evaluation of immunogenicity and cross-reactivity.
Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rationally designed minimized TbpB confers broad protection against meningococcal infection.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Structure-based engineering of a nutrient acquisition protein enhances neutralizing antibodies and protection for the development of a gonococcal vaccine.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Immunogenic Potential of ApxI and ApxII fromVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of anNarra J · 2025Article
- Article
- Rational selection of TbpB variants yields a bivalent vaccine with broad coverage against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Liquid Liver Biopsy for Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional ELISA-based protein analysis has been predicated on the assumption that proteins bind randomly to the solid surface of the ELISA plate polymer (polystyrene or polyvinyl chloride). Random adherence to the plate ensures equal access to all faces of the protein, an important consideration when evaluating immunogenicity of polyclonal serum samples as well as when examining the cross-reactivity of immune serum against different antigenic variants of a protein. In this study we demonstrate that the soluble form of the surface lipoprotein transferrin binding protein B (TbpB) from three different bacterial pathogens (Neisseria meningitidis, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, and Mannheimia haemolytica) bind the ELISA plate in a manner that consistently obscures the transferrin binding face of the proteins' N-lobe. In order to develop a non-biased ELISA where all faces of the protein are accessible, the strong interaction between biotin and avidin has been exploited by adding a biotin tag to these proteins during Escherichia coli-based cytoplasmic expression and utilizing streptavidin or neutravidin coated ELISA plates for protein capture and display. The use of avidin coated ELISA plates also allows for rapid purification of biotin-tagged proteins from crude E. coli lysates, removing the requirement of prior affinity purification of each protein to be included in the ELISA-based analyses. In proof of concept experiments we demonstrate the utility of this approach for evaluating immunogenicity and cross-reactivity of serum from mice and pigs immunized with TbpBs from human and porcine pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.