ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy
Family-Centered practice in a Brazilian rehabilitation network service.
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of family-centered care in the pediatric rehabilitation ward: a participatory action research.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily-centered practice (FCP) is widely accepted as a best practice in pediatric rehabilitation. However, its implementation in Brazil is incipient, and systematic documentation of the extent to which it has been achieved is not available.
objectivesTo determine parents' and service providers' perceptions of family-centeredness and specific areas in need of improvement in four rehabilitation hospitals.
methodsA total of 107 caregivers and 89 service providers responded to the Measure of Processes of Care-20 (MPOC-20) and the Measure of Processes of Care for Service providers (MPOC-SP), respectively. The MPOC questionnaires evaluate FCP from the point of view of parents and rehabilitation professionals. Domain scores within each questionnaire were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. MPOC items with low scores (from 1-4 out of 7 by 33% or more of respondents) were considered to indicate weaknesses in service delivery.
resultsMedian MPOC-20 scores varied from 5.2 (4.7, 5.8) (Providing General Information) to 7.0 (6.0, 7.0) (Enabling and Partnership). The Providing General Information scores were significantly lower than those of other domains (p < 0.003). The MPOC-SP scores varied from 4.8 (4.0, 5.8) (Providing General Information) to 6.1 (5.8, 6.6) (Treating People Respectfully). Scores for Treating People Respectfully were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) and Providing General Information scores significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than those of the other domains. Most items with high percentages of low scores were from the domain Providing General Information.
conclusionExcept for Providing General Information, the results indicated that services implement FCP "to a fairly great extent," comparing favorably to international data. Provision of information can be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.