Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33722193›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Early mobility after fragility hip fracture: a mixed methods embedded case study.

Lynn Haslam-Larmer, Catherine Donnelly, Mohammad Auais, Kevin Woo, Vincent DePaul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lynn Haslam-LarmerQueen's University, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. lynn.haslamlarmer@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2554-1981
Catherine DonnellyQueen's University, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Mohammad AuaisQueen's University, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Kevin WooQueen's University, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Vincent DePaulQueen's University, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.

Funding

Sunnybrook Research Institute PBRI Seed Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing a hip fracture up to 60% of patients are unable to regain their pre-fracture level of mobility. For hospitalized older adults, the deconditioning effect of bedrest and functional decline has been identified as the most preventable cause of ambulation loss. Recent studies demonstrate that this older adult population spends greater than 80% of their time in bed during hospitalization, despite being ambulatory before their fracture. We do not fully understand why there continues to be such high rates of sedentary times, given that evidence demonstrates functional decline is preventable and early mobility recommendations have been available for over a decade.

methodsA descriptive mixed method embedded case study was selected to understand the phenomenon of early mobility after fragility hip fracture surgery. In this study, the main case was one post-operative unit with a history of recommendation implementation, and the embedded units were patients recovering from hip fracture repair. Data from multiple sources provided an understanding of mobility activity initiation and patient participation.

resultsActivity monitor data from eighteen participants demonstrated a mean sedentary time of 23.18 h. Median upright time was 24 min, and median number of steps taken was 30. Qualitative interviews from healthcare providers and patients identified two main categories of themes; themes external to the person and themes unique to the person. We identified four factors that can influence mobility; a patient's pre-fracture functional status, cognitive status, medical unpredictability, and preconceived notions held by healthcare providers and patients.

conclusionsThere are multi-level factors that require consideration with implementation of best practice interventions, namely, systemic, healthcare provider related, and patient related. An increased risk of poor outcomes occurs with compounding multiple factors, such as a patient with low pre-fracture functional mobility, cognitive impairment, and a mismatch of expectations. The study reports several variables to be important considerations for facilitating early mobility. Communicating mobility expectations and addressing physical and psychological readiness are essential. Our findings can be used to develop meaningful healthcare provider and patient-centred interventions to address the risks of poor outcomes.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHip FracturesAgedHospitalizationHumansEmbedded case studyFragility hip fracture

Identifiers

PMID33722193
PMCPMC7962231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.