Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33721978›Full record

Observational studySingapore medical journal2022

A risk prediction score to identify patients at low risk for COVID-19 infection.

Wui Mei Chew, Chee Hong Loh, Aditi Jalali, Grace Shi En Fong, Loshini Senthil Kumar, Rachel Hui Zhen Sim, Russell Pinxue Tan, Sunil Ravinder Gill, Trilene Ruiting Liang, Jansen Meng Kwang Koh and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Singapore medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prediction model to identify infectious COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  4. Inter-rater reliability and prospective validation of a clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wui Mei ChewDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Chee Hong LohDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Aditi JalaliDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Grace Shi En FongDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Loshini Senthil KumarDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Rachel Hui Zhen SimDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Russell Pinxue TanDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Sunil Ravinder GillDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Trilene Ruiting LiangDepartment of General Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Jansen Meng Kwang KohDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Tunn Ren TayDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Changi General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Singapore's enhanced surveillance programme for COVID-19 identifies and isolates hospitalised patients with acute respiratory symptoms to prevent nosocomial spread. We developed risk prediction models to identify patients with low risk for COVID-19 from this cohort of hospitalised patients with acute respiratory symptoms. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective observational study. Patients admitted to our institution's respiratory surveillance wards from 10 February to 30 April 2020 contributed data for analysis. Prediction models for COVID-19 were derived from a training cohort using variables based on demographics, clinical symptoms, exposure risks and blood investigations fitted into logistic regression models. The derived prediction models were subsequently validated on a test cohort. Results: Of the 1,228 patients analysed, 52 (4.2%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Two prediction models were derived, the first based on age, presence of sore throat, dormitory residence, blood haemoglobin level (Hb), and total white blood cell counts (TW), and the second based on presence of headache, contact with infective patients, Hb and TW. Both models had good diagnostic performance with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.934 and 0.866, respectively. Risk score cut-offs of 0.6 for Model 1 and 0.2 for Model 2 had 100% sensitivity, allowing identification of patients with low risk for COVID-19. Limiting COVID-19 screening to only elevated-risk patients reduced the number of isolation days for surveillance patients by up to 41.7% and COVID-19 swab testing by up to 41.0%. Conclusion: Prediction models derived from our study were able to identify patients at low risk for COVID-19 and rationalise resource utilisation.

Indexed as

COVID-19HemoglobinsHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2HemoglobinsCOVID-19 infectioninfection controlrespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID33721978
PMCPMC9584071
OpenAlexW3139067822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.