Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33721517›Full record

ReviewAnnals of internal medicine2021

Antibody Response After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Implications for Immunity : A Rapid Living Review.

Irina Arkhipova-Jenkins, Mark Helfand, Charlotte Armstrong, Emily Gean, Joanna Anderson, Robin A Paynter, Katherine Mackey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irina Arkhipova-JenkinsScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (I.A.J., C.A., E.G., R.A.P.).
Mark HelfandScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Evidence Synthesis Program, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (M.H.).
Charlotte ArmstrongScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (I.A.J., C.A., E.G., R.A.P.).ORCID 0000-0001-7918-5228
Emily GeanScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (I.A.J., C.A., E.G., R.A.P.).
Joanna AndersonVA Evidence Synthesis Program and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (J.A., K.M.).
Robin A PaynterScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (I.A.J., C.A., E.G., R.A.P.).
Katherine MackeyVA Evidence Synthesis Program and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (J.A., K.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-4749-5664
VA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical significance of the antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. PURPOSE: To synthesize evidence on the prevalence, levels, and durability of detectable antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection and whether antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 confer natural immunity. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization global literature database, and Covid19reviews.org from 1 January through 15 December 2020, limited to peer-reviewed publications available in English. STUDY SELECTION: Primary studies characterizing the prevalence, levels, and duration of antibodies in adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); reinfection incidence; and unintended consequences of antibody testing. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators sequentially extracted study data and rated quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Moderate-strength evidence suggests that most adults develop detectable levels of IgM and IgG antibodies after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and that IgG levels peak approximately 25 days after symptom onset and may remain detectable for at least 120 days. Moderate-strength evidence suggests that IgM levels peak at approximately 20 days and then decline. Low-strength evidence suggests that most adults generate neutralizing antibodies, which may persist for several months like IgG. Low-strength evidence also suggests that older age, greater disease severity, and presence of symptoms may be associated with higher antibody levels. Some adults do not develop antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection for reasons that are unclear. LIMITATIONS: Most studies were small and had methodological limitations; studies used immunoassays of variable accuracy.

conclusionMost adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-PCR develop antibodies. Levels of IgM peak early in the disease course and then decline, whereas IgG peaks later and may remain detectable for at least 120 days. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42020207098).

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAntibodies, ViralAntibody SpecificityCOVID-19HumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MPneumonia, ViralReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID33721517
PMCPMC8025942
OpenAlexW3136854939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.