Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33721214›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2021

Gabapentinoids for Pruritus in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.

Shreya A Sreekantaswamy, Nicholas Mollanazar, Daniel C Butler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shreya A SreekantaswamySan Francisco Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicholas MollanazarDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel C ButlerSan Francisco Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Daniel.Butler@UCSF.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no standardized algorithm for the treatment of chronic pruritus (CP), or itch lasting more than 6 weeks, in adults aged ≥ 65 years. The antiepileptic agents gabapentin and pregabalin, however, are gaining popularity in the dermatologic community for their efficacy in treating CP of neuropathic origin. Yet the lack of literature specifically looking at the safety and efficacy of these medications in older adults results in limited guidance for providers in the safe use of gabapentinoids. In this paper we discuss special considerations and recommendations for treating older adults with gabapentin and pregabalin and explore the possibility for these drugs to ameliorate CP of multiple etiologies.

Indexed as

Chronic pruritusGabapentinGabapentinoidItchOlder adultPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID33721214
PMCPMC8163906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.