Observational studyAdvances in therapy2021
Effectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database.
Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04138758 (Effectiveness and Safety of Maintenance Treatment With Combination of Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Comparison to Maintenance Treatment With a Combination of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-acting β2 Agonists in COPD Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Safety of Maintenance Treatment With Combination of Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Comparison to Maintenance Treatment With a Combination of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-acting β2 Agonists in COPD Patients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of different doses of Budesonide combined with Tiotropium bromide inhalation on elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Direct Medical Costs of COPD in the USA: An Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2017-2018.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Article
- Prescription Patterns of New Use of Fixed-Dose Combination Inhalers in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Long-Acting β2 Agonists Plus Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists versus Long-Acting β2 Agonists Plus Inhaled Corticosteroids.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β
methodsAdministrative healthcare claims and laboratory results data from the US HealthCore Integrated Research Database
resultsThe total population consisted of 61,985 patients (tiotropium/olodaterol n = 2684; LABA/ICS n = 59,301); after reweighting, the total was 42,953 patients (tiotropium/olodaterol n = 2600; LABA/ICS n = 40,353; mean age 65 years; female 54.5%). Patients treated with tiotropium/olodaterol versus LABA/ICS experienced a reduction in the risk of COPD exacerbations (adjusted hazard ratio 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.85]), pneumonia (0.74 [0.57, 0.97]), escalation to triple therapy (0.22 [0.19, 0.26]), and any one of these events (0.45 [0.41, 0.49]); the combined risk was similar irrespective of baseline eosinophils and exacerbation history.
conclusionsIn patients with COPD, tiotropium/olodaterol was associated with a lower risk of COPD exacerbations, pneumonia, and escalation to triple therapy versus LABA/ICS, both individually and in combination; the combined risk was reduced irrespective of baseline eosinophils or exacerbation history.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04138758 (registered 23 October 2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.