Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33721160›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2022

A Multicenter Study of Patient Acceptability of the IBD Disk Tool and Patient-Reported Disabilities.

Neel Sharma, Edo Savelkoul, Benjamin Disney, Ashit Shah, Shanika De Silva, Sanjeev Pattni, Marietta Iacucci, Rachel Cooney, Subrata Ghosh

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Neel SharmaInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. n.sharma.1@bham.ac.uk.
Edo SavelkoulRadboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Benjamin DisneyUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Ashit ShahThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Shanika De SilvaThe Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.
Sanjeev PattniLeicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Marietta IacucciNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rachel CooneyInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Subrata GhoshNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBDudley Group NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIBD, both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is associated with significant functional disability. Gastrointestinal symptoms alone are not the sole purpose of the interaction between patients and providers. In order to ascertain patients' disabilities, we utilized the recently developed IBD Disk to help determine their functional concerns and initiate relevant conversation. We aimed to ascertain patient acceptability and their major disabilities. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this multicenter study, IBD patients at their outpatient visit were given the paper version of the IBD Disk. Patients were asked to score their level of disability for each item of the IBD Disk. The completed scores were then shared with their healthcare provider to act as a focus of discussion during the consultation. Patients and clinicians were also asked to provide informal qualitative feedback as to the benefits of the IBD Disk and areas for improvement.

resultsA total of 377 (female 60%) patients completed the questionnaires over the study period. Patient acceptability scored on a 0-10 Likert scale was excellent. All patients scored all domains of disability. Sleep, energy, and joint pain were the highest scoring domains of the IBD Disk, scoring higher than digestive symptoms. Clinicians and patients agreed that the IBD Disk allowed for ease of communication about disability symptoms and relevance to their day-to-day functioning.

conclusionThe IBD Disk is a novel easy-to-use tool to assess the functional disability of patients. We next plan to utilize it in the form of an electronic app internationally and in relation to treatment commencement and escalation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAbdominal PainAdultArthralgiaFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastroenterologistsHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSleep Wake DisordersDisabilityEnergyIBD DiskJoint painSleep

Identifiers

PMID33721160
OpenAlexW3138713431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.