Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33721101›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Seasonal variation of potentially toxic metal contamination in Yamuna riverine ecosystem, Delhi, India.

Shobhika Parmar, Vijay K Sharma, Vir Singh, Ravindra N Kharwar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shobhika ParmarDepartment of Environmental Science, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Uttarakhand, 263145, Pantnagar, India. shobikaparmar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-7363
Vijay K SharmaDepartment of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, 7505101, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Vir SinghDepartment of Environmental Science, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Uttarakhand, 263145, Pantnagar, India.
Ravindra N KharwarMycopathology and Microbial Technology Laboratory, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Banaras Hindu University, U.P, 221005, Varanasi, India.
Agricultural Research Organization · ILBanaras Hindu University · INGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology · INKunming University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The River Yamuna in Delhi region, the National Capital Territory (NCT) of India, carries potentially toxic metals such as Cr, Pb, Mn, Mg, Hg, Fe and Zn. These contaminants are discharged mainly from industrial wastes, agricultural and household activities and domestic sewage. A total of 12 stations (2.5 to 3.5 km apart from each other) were selected for the study, covering the upstream and downstream areas of river Yamuna in Delhi. The investigated sites were evaluated for significant difference between upstream and downstream locations of river Yamuna in three different time periods (June, October, February). Metal contamination were measured in water, sediments (2 μm) and nearby agriculture soil of the river Yamuna, and found with high metal loads as compared with the international standards, chiefly in the downstream sites as the river flows through the Delhi stretch. The multivariate statistical analysis revealed spatial and temporal variations in the metal concentrations which suggest seasonal variation and common point source of some metals while different sources of other metals. The contamination of the river water and adjoining agriculture soils points towards possible entry of these metals into the food chain. The study indicates that considering the current status of metal pollution, the surface water is not in good conditions for use as drinking purpose because of the high concentrations of few potentially toxic metals. Our study recommends regular monitoring of toxic metals in Yamuna river water and sediments, strict ban on the domestic, agriculture and industrial waste disposal for the restoration of the river to its natural state.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringGeologic SedimentsIndiaSeasonsMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalAgriculture soilsMetal contaminationMultivariate statistical analysisPotentially toxic metalSeasonal variationSedimentsWaterYamuna river

Identifiers

PMID33721101
OpenAlexW3136512623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.