Trial reportPloS one2021
Prediction of cycloplegic refraction for noninvasive screening of children for refractive error.
Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06346626 (To Evaluate the Consistency and Repeatability of Portable Automatic Optometry 2-WINS for Cycloplegic Optometry in Adolescents and Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
To Evaluate the Consistency and Repeatability of Portable Automatic Optometry 2-WINS for Cycloplegic Optometry in Adolescents and Children
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corrected Percentile Curves to Track Myopisation-The Anyang Childhood Eye Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Multinomial Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms for Identifying Refractive Status in Chinese School Aged Children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Machine learning classification of cycloplegic refractive status in children and adolescents using non-cycloplegic data across ten provincial-level administrative divisions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Factors influencing refractive status distribution and amblyopia in preschool children with low vision.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Prediction of refractive error in adolescents using a multimodal large language model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- To Evaluate the Agreement and Repeatability of the Eyerobo VS Portable Autorefractor Cycloplegic Refraction in Children and Adolescents.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Rapid and accurate prediction of cycloplegic refraction in Chinese children: development and validation of machine learning models.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Myopia Prediction Using Machine Learning: An External Validation Study.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting Cycloplegic Spherical Equivalent Refraction Among Children and Adolescents Using Non-cycloplegic Data and Machine Learning - China, 2020-2024.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- Predictive Modeling of Cycloplegic Refraction Using Non-Cycloplegia Ocular Parameters With Emphasis on Lens-Related Features.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- A nomogram for identifying premyopia and myopia candidates in Chinese children: focusing on those with cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction ≤ + 0.75D.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Refractive development III: Variations in emmetropia and ametropia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Machine learning-driven prediction of cycloplegic refractive error in Chinese children.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error and Myopia Status Based on Non-Cycloplegic Data in Chinese Students.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Prediction of refractive error and its progression: a machine learning-based algorithm.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Refractive Error and Axial Length and Their Related Factors in 8-Year-Old Japanese Children: The Yamanashi Adjunct Study of the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Prediction of spherical equivalent difference before and after cycloplegia in school-age children with machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Ocular biometrics and uncorrected visual acuity for detecting myopia in Chinese school students.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Prediction for Cycloplegic Refractive Error in Chinese School Students: Model Development and Validation.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of refractive error in children is crucial to avoid amblyopia and its impact on quality of life. We here performed a retrospective study in order to develop prediction models for spherical and cylinder refraction in children. The enrolled 1221 eyes of 617 children were divided into three groups: the development group (710 eyes of 359 children), the validation group (385 eyes of 194 children), and the comparison group (126 eyes of 64 children). We determined noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction values by autorefractometry. In addition, several noncycloplegic parameters were assessed with the use of ocular biometry. On the basis of the information obtained from the development group, we developed prediction models for cycloplegic spherical and cylinder refraction in children with the use of stepwise multiple regression analysis. The prediction formulas were validated by their application to the validation group. The similarity of noncycloplegic and predicted refraction to cycloplegic refraction in individual eyes was evaluated in the comparison group. Application of the developed prediction models for spherical and cylinder refraction to the validation group revealed that predicted refraction was significantly correlated with measured values for cycloplegic spherical refraction (R = 0.961, P < 0.001) or cylinder refraction (R = 0.894, P < 0.001). Comparison of noncycloplegic, cycloplegic, and predicted refraction in the comparison group revealed that cycloplegic spherical refraction did not differ significantly from predicted refraction but was significantly different from noncycloplegic refraction, whereas cycloplegic cylinder refraction did not differ significantly from predicted or noncycloplegic values. Our prediction models based on ocular biometry provide estimates of refraction in children similar to measured cycloplegic spherical and cylinder refraction values without the application of cycloplegic eyedrops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.