Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33720924›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Risk Factors and Safety Analyses for Intrapartum Fever in Pregnant Women Receiving Epidural Analgesia During Labor.

Jie Ren, Tao Wang, Bo Yang, Lihua Jiang, Linglan Xu, Xiaoyuan Geng, Qian Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Tao WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Bo YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Lihua JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Linglan XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Xiaoyuan GengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Qian LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland).
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND We aimed to explore the factors leading to epidural-related maternal fever and the influence of intrapartum fever on neonates. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on data from pregnant women who received epidural analgesia during labor. The primary aim was to determine the influence of epidural labor analgesia on the incidence of intrapartum fever in pregnant women. The secondary aim was to determine the influence of intrapartum fever on neonates. RESULTS Logistic regression analysis showed that premature rupture of membranes (OR=2.008, 95% CI: 1.551-2.600), vaginal examination performed more than 6 times (OR=1.681, 95% CI: 1.286-2.197), long duration of labor (OR=1.090, 95% CI: 1.063-1.118), and long time from rupture of membranes to delivery (OR=1.048, 95% CI: 1.010-1.087) were all risk factors for intrapartum fever in pregnant women with epidural labor analgesia. Regarding the secondary research outcome, the incidence of intrapartum fever was significantly associated with the number of neonates with Apgar score of 10 delivered from pregnant women with epidural labor analgesia (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the transfer rate of newborns to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Premature rupture of membranes, vaginal examination performed more than 6 times, long duration of labor, and long time from rupture of membranes to delivery are all factors raising the risk of fever during epidural labor analgesia. Although intrapartum fever in the mothers had a significant influence on the number of neonates with Apgar score of 10, it did not affect the outcome of neonates in terms of NICU transfer rate.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesia, EpiduralApgar ScoreChinaFemaleFeverHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, ObstetricObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancyPregnant PeopleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33720924
PMCPMC7976662
OpenAlexW3131411233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.